COMPARATIVE POLITICS PDF

adminComment(0)

PDF | On Jan 1, , Timothy Lim and others published In book: Doing Comparative Politics: An Introduction to Approaches and Issues. Politics: An Analysis of Leading Journals,” Comparative Political Studies (); ( with Though scholars of comparative politics have produced a vast amount of. Define key terms covered in the chapter, such as politics, power, the state, nation, science, hypothesis, and. (dependent and independent) variables. ▫ Discuss.


Comparative Politics Pdf

Author:TERA DAUDELIN
Language:English, German, Arabic
Country:Ghana
Genre:Academic & Education
Pages:376
Published (Last):31.07.2015
ISBN:895-2-24721-260-9
ePub File Size:15.66 MB
PDF File Size:11.35 MB
Distribution:Free* [*Sign up for free]
Downloads:30785
Uploaded by: SIMONA

This article discusses several crucial questions that comparative political scientists address. These questions also form part of the basis of the current volume. Comparative Politics: Approach and. Concepts. I. What is Comparative Politics? II . Elements of the Political System. A. Governmental Institutions. B. Political. PDF Drive is your search engine for PDF files. As of today we have theories and issues involved in the study of comparative politics. Focusing on KEN.

Read More Thoreau Quote Analysis Thoreau was trying to suggest that people are obedient to unjust governments because they lose sight of their morals and are led by sins. In the following sentence Thoreau wrote, After the first blush of sin, comes its indifference and from immoral it becomes, as it were, unmoral, This book shows how the TRC truth and reconciliation commission s restricted mandate has affected what TRC is, how it is heard, who speaks, how they speak and who Read More Compare and contract by how one right-wing and one left-wing single party leader consolidated power.

One left-wing single party leader was Stalin, while Hitler is a right-wing single party leader. Both are known through history for doing quite terrible things to their own people and other people. Read More Compare the reforms carried out by the Late Qing government and the Nanjing government in terms of their impact on the development of China's modernization. The reforms of the Late Qing government and the Nanjing government had their own impacts on the development of China's modernization.

Read More The Letters Patent declared the Crown-appointed Governor to be the head of the government and ordered the formation of the Executive and Legislative Councils to assist in administration. The Hong Kong governor was largely controlled by the British government during the early 20th century according to legislative and executive powers, Read More Discussion Communism in the Soviet Union only brought more oppression and brutality through the emergence of civil wars and lack of freedom incorporated by the government.

The three-year war only ended up worsening the economy as there was no peasant production and crops plummeted as many people starved. Democratic Rule The function of government is used all over the world in several different forms. Many countries use a governmental system in order to keep their country from becoming corrupt.

Read More While democracy is present in much of the modern world, it is difficult to define exactly what democracy is due to the varying ways of governing present in the world. Some types of government systems include absolute control and democratic rule. In this paper, I will compare England and Germany according to Lijpharts models of majoritarian and consensus democracies.

To the South, slavery was such an intrinsic institution in their Read More This essay seeks to explain why the British Constitution, unlike those of other countries such as the USA, Germany and many other countries, is so difficult to define.

To define the constitution is taken to mean knowing the supreme rules that regulate the actions of various governing bodies and their Read More Elite theory states that an elite, ruling class controls the power in society through their accumulation of wealth and knowledge.

Dryzek and Dunleavy This is used to control the masses who are easily duped with a desire to be ruled. Read More Abstract Consensus is the belief in abandoning all values, principles and policies. There is a commonly held belief that it doesn't matter who thepresident of the United States is because they hold very little actualpower. It is a general sentiment about not only the President, butpoliticians in general.

Many hold the belief that all politicians arebeholden to special Read More In many different ancient cultures, religion held a significant importance. The gods were given sacrifices, great temples, and fantastic mythological stories were told in the Middle East, China, and all along the Mediterranean.

In Rome too, religion held a particular importance for both the plebeians and the patricians, who both Read More Both readings from this week, Dreams from my Father and Rules for Radicals, are concerned with the organizer as an individual.

What does the daily life of an organizer look like? Numerous Fascist leaders of the far-right wing and Communists of the far-left were able to take advantage of Read More How did the rise of nationalism, formation of nation-states and movements of political reform affect the world during this period of time?

The unification of Italy and Germany began because nationalism was starting to be used by conservatives to win support for the existing social order. Read More The government plays a very big role in the United States, it makes sure we the people are all behaving and doing things in a certain manner. Our government has set itself up into a mixed economy where we have different sectors like public, government, and private. Read More The Communist Manifesto and the Industrial Workers In the Communist Manifesto, Marx and Engels lay out a plan that looks to benefit the industrial workers and put an end to the unequal social conditions and working conditions that those workers experience.

These very struggles can be seen through the words of Bhutan, a country in South Asia that recently transitioned from being an absolute monarchy to a constitutional Articles and reports on. Demonstrated ability to formulate responses to questions in novel and relevant ways. May also display some faults, such as missing certain aspects of the question, containing patches of weaker material, or failing to articulate the writer's own views. Demonstrates good knowledge of primary material and firm grasp of critical debates and concepts, which are deployed as part of a broader argument.

Evidence of potential to proceed to further postgraduate research. Shows some capacity for independent and critical analysis, but may be poor in terms of individual research. Relevant but limited reading and use of examples and evidence. Lacks evidence of ability to proceed to further postgraduate research. Presentation satisfactory: possible problems with e.

Little or no ability to structure thoughts coherently. Little or no evidence of capacity for independent and critical analysis. Presentation poor: does not respect scholarly conventions. Submission Guidelines - Perspectives on Politics For all correspondence related to book reviews and review essays, please. We use cookies and other technologies to customize your experience, perform analytics and deliver personalized advertising on our sites, apps and newsletters and across the Internet based on your interests.

Creative writing for tv and new media sp Creative writing professional organizations Our Australian subject-oriented and professional academic writers are adept at writing programming language projects according to the Australian university guidelines. Have a look at the fields which our computer programming assignment help experts from Australia cover: If you are struggling with any programming homework, then our programming experts are there to assist you.

By taking our help with programming assignments, you can be assured of scoring topmost grades. Students cannot get hold of programming languages or master the concepts of programming without absorbing the theoretical concepts and consistent practice.

Edited by Carol Lancaster and Nicolas van de Walle

Not having sufficient knowledge and subject expertise are the primary reasons for the students to seek programming assignment help from the professionals in Australia. Moreover, it is tricky to implement and execute the programming concepts and write the code to make desktop applications, web applications, animation and others.

Our experienced programming homework help experts understand the fundamentals of programming languages, and thus it is easy for them to work on C , C , C, Java or any other programming languages. If your concern is to submit the project within the deadline, then get your work done within the stipulated time frame by highly qualified experts who offer excellent help with programming.

Get the best programming solutions according to your requirements only at Instant Assignment Help. To know why most of the university students studying in Australia prefer us over other online writing service providers, go through the incredible features that our programming assignment help service offers: We are dedicated to offering you help with programming given by qualified programming language assignment help experts who understand what your university exactly demands.

Several students studying in Brisbane, Canberra, Perth, Sydney, Adelaide, Melbourne have taken advantage of our services to excel in academics. If you want to take high-quality programming help, then we are the best to consider.

Place your order today via live chat, e-mail or toll-free number and connect with our computer programming experts instantly. Ba creative writing distance learning The life of a student is said to be an amazing experience full of parties, part-time jobs, tricky relationships, and fun.

The truth is that the life of an ordinary student is way more complicated. Every day you have a busy schedule, which consists of studies for the most part. No wonder that students make mistakes in their texts and submit papers, which simply do not deserve high grades. Net, will be glad to provide you with the most effective proofreading help.

Our company specializes in professional proofreading, writing, and editing. We have been assisting English-speaking students in submitting their papers since Collaborating with our paper proofreading service has lots of benefits.

Throughout the years of working, we have helped many students to deliver high-quality documents. First, we make sure your text is flawless and, therefore give you more free time to do your after-school activities and enjoy those rare moments of happiness. Secondly, our writers tackle your project on schedule, so you get your essay when it is needed.

Thirdly, we guarantee your confidentiality as a client at our company. To be sure that the words mentioned above are truthful, see how critical we are when hiring members to our team: We send an academically-approved test on grammar and style to the applicants, who have passed an ATS. It is mandatory to finish the project during a selected period. At this stage, applicants have to get at least 85 points for this assignment.

Every tenth job-seeker is invited for an interview with our recruiters. At this stage, we test the soft skills of our potential employees. The most important qualities we seek for in candidates are attentiveness, time-management skills, discipline, stress resistance, creativity, and responsiveness.

During this period, each step of the expert is monitored by our mentor — a person working with us 2 years. When the probationary period is over, the mentor gives feedback about the applicant and the final decision about applicant employment is made. By being this hard on employing, we make sure our clients collaborate with the most professional experts. So, simply start using our essay proofreading service, and we will delegate your task to one of our experts.

In situations when students strive for the assistance of academic proofreading services, we come in handy. They detect all misspellings, fix grammatical mistakes and make necessary changes to improve text readability.

Thus, our writers may change paragraphs, do general paraphrasing or correct other errors. If you need a more in-depth inspection of your project, try out our editing option. Either service you pick, we will provide you with: Are you worried about the price? All prices are student-friendly as students are our primary target audience. Thus, we charge reasonably, and the cost of our proofreading services online start at only. As the price for our assistance depends primarily on the deadline, leave us more time to work on your project, and the overall receipt for the best proofreading services will be cheaper.

Now you know how to ease your life and submit essays hassle-free. If you feel that your paper may be not perfect, consider using our professional proofreading services. But not all nominal democracies generate accountable, clean governments. In a chapter reproduced in this volume, Susan Stokes addresses one of the possible causes of malfunctioning democracies by looking at the practices, causes, and consequences of clientelism.

Shaped by a sociological approach, researchers at that time explained clientelism as a practice underpinned by a set p. Yet, as Stokes claims, clientelism must rather be seen as a game in which patrons and clients behave strategically and in which they understand that, given certain external conditions such as a certain level of development and the organizational conditions that allow for the effective monitoring of the other side , they are better off sustaining a pattern of exchange over the long run.

Such a theoretical account then allows us to make predictions, which are beginning to be tested empirically, about the institutions underpinning clientelistic practices, the electoral strategies pursued by patrons, and the potential economic and political effects of clientelism: Political activism has also spawned a large body of research.

In her chapter in the Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics , Pippa Norris reviews the social and psychological model of participation developed by Verba and Nie, as well as the critiques generated from a rational choice perspective. She then examines how key developments in the research community and the political world have affected the ways in which we evaluate this subfield. She notes a growing interest in the role of institutions in shaping participation in general and turnout in particular.

Echoing Wren and McElwain, she draws our attention to changes in party membership, which was widespread and hence instrumental in many advanced democracies but has progressively shrunk, with consequences that are still widely debated among scholars.

The constructs of trust and social capital, pioneered by Coleman and Putnam, are also relevant to our expectations about levels of participation. All of these, she notes, have expanded and in a way marginalized the more institutionalized, party- and union-based mechanisms of participation that dominated in the past.

In the magisterial five-volume Handbook of Political Science published thirty years ago by Greenstein and Polsby, the term accountability appears not once. The term representation appears sporadically and, outside of the volume on political theory, only a handful of times. Thirty years later, accountability has emerged as an organizing concept in comparative politics, with representation not far behind. If everyone in a society had the same preferences, the problem would not be a problem at all.

But never is this the case. And scholarship on preference aggregation must come to grips with social choice theory, which should lead us to doubt that citizens in any setting in which politics is multidimensional can p.

The dominant strains of research, some of which come to grips with the social choice challenge and others of which ignore it, include examinations of the congruence between preferences and outcomes of various sorts Powell Another sort of congruence study examines the coherence of issue positions among co-partisans, both political elites and citizens who identify with parties, and tends to find a good deal more coherence among the former than among the latter.

Yet another deals with the congruence between electoral platforms and campaign promises, and government policy. Neoinstitutional scholars have focused their attention on electoral rules, executives, legislatures, federalism and, more recently, the judiciary. The existing work on executives and legislatures has centered on two broad topics. First, what is the effect of a constitutional structure based on the separation of powers? Second, what determines the patterns of coalition-making in governments?

In the volume we edited, Samuels reviews what we know about the impact of the separation of powers on accountability. The conventional view in the United States is that a separation of powers is so central to democratic accountability that this separation is nearly definitional of democracy. Samuels evaluates this proposition empirically.

His own research and that of other authors which he reviews address questions of accountability and representation, as well as the effects of a separation of powers on the policy process and on regime stability. Among his central findings is that presidentialism has several deleterious effects; a separation of executive from legislative powers increases the chances for policy deadlock and for the breakdown of democracy.

In turn, Strom and Nyblade critically assess the literature on coalition-making, particularly regarding the formation of governments in parliamentary democracies. Although influential theoretically, this approach proved to be rather unsatisfactory empirically. As discussed by Pablo Beramendi in a thought-provoking chapter, we know far less than we should about federalism. Our theories on the origins of federalism are still sketchy—security threats, the level of heterogeneity, and the evolution of the world economy in terms of its level of integration shape the extent of decentralization in a critical manner.

The study of the consequences of federalism is slightly more advanced. The relationship between democracy and federalism seems to be conditional, as far as we know, on the particular internal structure of federalism. The effects on the economy of having a federal structure, in turn, depend on how the federal institutions allocate power and responsibilities between the center and regional governments.

The study of the judiciary was traditionally reserved to legal scholars. Assessing judicial independence, as these authors acknowledge, is not always straightforward. They advocate two measures: The authors note that a drawback of either approach is that courts, which seek among other objectives not to have their decisions reversed, may rule against governments only when they anticipate not being reversed, in which case these measures would tend to overestimate their independence.

Hence, whereas rulings against governments probably indicate independence, rulings in their favor are less certain indications of dependence see Helmke ; It was in the s, that is, about two decades after comparative politics started to develop causal, testable theories, that political scientists ventured in a systematic way p. Part of that growing interest in political economics started with the analysis by political sociologists of voting and, particularly, of economic voting.

The first models presented a simple rule of thumb that voters could—and did—apply when deciding whether to vote for incumbents: Factors that Duch suggests will influence economic voting include party-system size, the size of government, coalition governments, trade openness, and the relative strength of governing and opposition parties in the legislature. At the same time that a few scholars studied how voters react to economic conditions, other researchers began exploring how politicians affect the economy and therefore voting decisions.

After Nordhaus published a seminal paper in on electoral business cycles, the scholarly literature has evolved in three complementary directions. A first set of studies has examined the impact of electoral cycles on the economy. Scholars now tend to agree that the presence of politically induced economic cycles is rather irregular. But, of course, this opens up an important question particularly from the point of view of democratic representation: Why should voters accept policy manipulation and leave governments unpunished?

In our volume, James Alt and Shanna Rose argue that political business cycles must be understood as a particular instance of the broader phenomenon of political accountability in democratic regimes.

Political business cycles are not merely the result of a signaling game in which politicians try to build their reputation as competent policy-makers. A second set of studies has focused on the effect that parties, mostly as congealed preferences, may have on macroeconomic policies.

Here scholars detect some, generally mild and mostly transitory, effect on macroeconomic factors: Left-wing governments tend to get lower unemployment than right-wing governments for a while, at the cost of permanently higher and even accelerating inflation Alesina et al. Yet these effects are mostly conditional on the institutional setup of central banks and wage bargaining institutions in which governments operate: This last insight has generated the third set of works in the political economics literature Hall and Franzese ; Alvarez, Garrett, and Lange After the first papers and books on the topic were written within the framework of modernization theory, welfare state scholars moved to assess the impact of power politics through parties and unions on the construction of different types of welfare states.

That class-based orientation, however, had limited validity beyond some archetypical cases with high levels of union mobilization and strong left-wing parties. In doing so, they have shifted our attention from the pure redistributive components of the welfare state, which were the keystone of pure class-based, power politics accounts, to social policies as insurance tools that address the problem of risk and volatility in the economy.

Related to this change in perspective, welfare state scholars have progressively spent more time mulling over the impact of the international economy on social policy.

Two path-breaking pieces by Cameron and Katzenstein showing economic openness and the welfare state to be positively correlated have been followed by an exciting scholarly debate that has alternatively related the result to a governmental response to higher risk due to more economic volatility in open economies , denied the correlation completely, or called for models that take openness and social policy as jointly determined.

As Carnes and Mares discuss in the essay we edited, the welfare state literature has indeed traveled a long way from its inception. Yet it still has a very exciting research agenda ahead of it: First, it should become truly global and extend the insights and problems of a field built around Europe and North America to the whole world; second, it should offer analytical models that combine the different parameters of the successive generations of research in the area; third, it should take seriously the preferences and beliefs of voters across the world and the cultural differences we observe about the proper role of the state ; and, finally, it ought to integrate the consequences of welfare states something about which we know much less than we should with the forces that erect them.

Whether the transition to democracy in many developing countries in recent decades has meant a shift to accountable, effective government is a question that has concerned many scholars of comparative politics. Although both the number of researchers and the theories on the topic have multiplied considerably, we still know little about the relationship between growth and political regimes.

We know that policy and performance vary considerably across democracies. Poor democracies show lower growth rates and worse public policies than rich democracies. In a nutshell, in spite of having formal mechanisms that should have increased political accountability and the welfare of the population in poor democracies, the provision of public goods and economic performance remain thoroughly deficient in those countries.

In our edited volume, Keefer claims that, since the key parameters of democracy and redistribution inequality and the struggle for political control between elites and nonelites cannot explain that outcome since low development and democratization are cast as contradictory , it must be political market imperfections that explain the failure of governments to deliver in democracies.

In young, poor democracies, politicians lack the credibility to run campaigns that promise the delivery of universal benefits and public goods. Accordingly, they shift to building personal networks and delivering particular goods. This type of electoral connection, compounded by low levels of information among voters, who can scarcely monitor politicians, results in extreme levels of corruption and bad governance. Economic voting would enforce accountability.

Whereas prime ministers are more likely to be turned out by voters when economic times are bad, they are more likely to be turned out by their colleagues when economic times are good. If as economic voting implies officeholders who produce bad economic outcomes will face the wrath of voters, why would they ever risk a costly transition to a liberalized economy? Reviewing the literature on economic transitions in Eastern Europe, Timothy Frye identifies a number of factors, from the quality of domestic governance to membership in the European Union, that make governments more likely to undertake reforms and then stick with them Frye Yet serious gaps remain in our understanding of the determinants of market reforms, including what role is played by institutional legacies from the past, and by contemporary social institutions—networks, business associations, reputational mechanisms—state institutions—courts, bureaucracies, legislatures—and the interaction of the two.

The questions posed above and others that our contributors raise are too complex, and too important, to restrict ourselves to one or another methodology in our attempts to answer them.

Comparative Politics

But the contributors to the Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics explain the advantages and pitfalls of a wide range of techniques deployed by compara-tists, from econometric analysis of cross-national data-sets and observational data to extended stints of fieldwork.

They employ a variegated tool kit to make sense of political processes and outcomes. John Gerring contends that neither case studies nor large- n comparisons are an unalloyed good; rather, both entail tradeoffs, and we are therefore well advised as a discipline to retain both approaches in our collective repertoire. Where case studies are good for building theory and developing insights, Gerring argues, large- n research is good for confirming or refuting theory.

Where case studies offer internal validity, large- n studies offer external validity. Where case studies allow scholars to explore causal mechanisms, large- n comparisons allow them to identify causal effects.

Comparative Politics

Interacting personally with subjects in their own setting may be the only way to get a handle on many crucial research questions, such as which of many potential political identities subjects embrace and what their self-defined interests are. Fieldwork is not without perils, Wood explains, both intellectual and personal.

Interview subjects may be evasive and even strategically dissimulating; field researchers may have strong personal reactions, positive or negative, to their subjects, reactions that may then color their conclusions; and fieldwork is a lonely endeavor, with predictable highs and lows. Wood suggests strategies for dealing with these pitfalls. James Mahoney and Celso Villegas discuss another variant of qualitative research: The aims of this research differ from those of cross-national studies, they contend.

Comparative political scientists, like empirically oriented sociologists and economists, are bedeviled by four problems: Yet as Franzese argues, these obstacles, which are in fact inherent to our trade, should not lead us to dodge quantitative strategies of research. On the contrary, a simple back-of-the-envelope calculation shows that the plausible loss of precision involved in measuring large numbers of observations does not justify retreating to qualitative studies of a few cases—even if we attain very precise knowledge about small samples, they fail to yield robust inferences.

Similarly, the presence of multiple and conditional causality cannot be solved easily by case studies although good process tracing may alleviate these problems.

Finally, qualitative case-study research does not necessarily escape p. To move from correlational analysis to causal propositions, Franzese contends, we need to employ more sophisticated techniques, such as variable instrumentation, matching, or vector autoregression. But even these techniques are not sufficient.

Here we would like to add that, influenced by a few macroeconomists and political economists, part of the discipline seems on the verge of uncritically embracing the use of instrumentation to deflect all the critiques that are leveraged against any work on the grounds that the latter suffer from endogeneity.

It turns out that there are very few, if any, instruments that are truly exogenous—basically, geography. Their use has extraordinary theoretical implications that researchers have either hardly thought about for example, that weather determines regime, in a sort of Montesquieuian manner or simply dodge when they posit that the instrument is simply a statistical artefact with no theoretical value on its own and then insist that it is the right one to substitute for the variable of interest.

Thus, we want to stress with Franzese that only theory-building can truly help us in reducing the problem of endogenous causation.

Evan S. Lieberman

Adam Przeworski offers a less optimistic perspective on observational research, large- n or otherwise. Because these covariates are unobserved, we cannot test the proposition that they, rather than the treatment or putative cause, are actually responsible for the effect.

Przeworski discusses traditional as well as more novel approaches to dealing with endogeneity, but his chapter leans toward pessimism. But perhaps the mood of the chapter is more pessimistic than it need be. Theory should help us distinguish cases in which endogeneity is plausibly present from ones in which it is not.

This task is implied by a hypothetical example that Przeworski offers. A researcher wishes to assess the impact of governing regime on economic growth. Future leaders of some countries study at universities where they become pro-democratic and learn how to manage economies, whereas others study at universities that make them prodictatorial and teach them nothing about economic management. Both kinds return home to become leaders and govern their societies and economies in the manner consistent with their training.

It therefore appears that democracy produces economic growth. But there is a difference between unobserved and unobserv able. It is not obvious to us why this variable could never be systematically observed, should p. Indeed, the use of game-theoretical models, of varying degrees of formalization, is a strong recent trend in comparative politics.

2nd year Political Science

Illustrating his methodological claims with his recent research on the politics of coffee production and commercialization, Bates offers a comprehensive strategy for comparative study. The first step of research is apprehension: Verstehen is then followed by explanation: The structure of the game allows us to push from the particular to the construction of broader theories, themselves susceptible of validation.

The construction of theoretical explanations must then be subject to the test of confirmation: This implies progressively moving from small- n comparisons to much larger data-sets in which researchers can evaluate their theories against a broad set of alternatives and controls.

An analysis of the methodological foundations of contemporary political research would be incomplete without an exploration of the role of rationalist assumptions in the discipline.

Ostrom assesses the first generation of studies of collective action, which stress the structural conditions number of players, type of benefits, heterogeneity of players, the degree of communication among them, and the iteration of games that may increase the likelihood of achieving cooperation. She finds these studies wanting. Ostrom recognizes that the rationalist model only explains part of human behavior. Hence she calls for a shift toward a theory of boundedly rational, norm-based human behavior.

Instead of positing a rationalistic individual, we should consider agents who are inherently living in a situation of informational uncertainty and who structure their actions, adopt their norms of behavior, and acquire their knowledge from the social and institutional context in which they live. They are capable of designing new tools—including institutions—that can change the structure of the worlds they face for good or evil purposes.

They adopt both short-term and long-term perspectives dependent on the structure of p. To some extent, the discipline seems to come full circle with this contribution: This journey has not been useless. On the contrary, as we traveled from one point to the other we have learned that a good theory of politics must be based on solid microfoundations; that is, on a plausible characterization of the interests, beliefs, and actions of individuals.

When we pause to take stock of the evolution of empirical political science in the last three decades, we think we should be pleased with the progress we have made as a community of scholars. The discipline has moved forward substantially in modeling certain political outcomes. We can offer the first inklings of theories of state formation and democratization.

We are in a position to understand how power is sustained and exercised in dictatorships.

We have fruitful models of the impact of institutions in preference aggregation and electoral behavior.

We are beginning to tackle with some analytical precision the problem of political accountability. As we argued at the beginning of the chapter, we think this progress has been brought about by three conceptual engines: There may be a hundred different things that need to be changed, improved, or altogether invented in our discipline. We will only stress one here. Many of our most successful models are simply equilibria. The gains from that type of methodological choice are clear.

But we still know little about the ways in which political institutions, social practices, norms, and arrays of political interests originate and collapse. History was important in the broad, sociological literature written a few decades ago. Yet the way in which it was tackled was messy or unsystematic.

Institutionalists altogether abandoned historical work. We think that, with the new tools we have in our hands, the right time has come to deal with that question again. To some extent, given the p. Alesina, A. Political Cycles and the Macroeconomy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Find this resource: Alt, J. Context-conditional political budget cycles. Alvarez, R. Government partisanship, labor organization and macroeconomic performance, — American Political Science Review , Anderson, B.

Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. New York: Bates, R. From case studies to social science: Boix, C. Setting the rules of the game: Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge University Press. The emergence of parties and party systems.

Some thoughts on the origins of inequality. Unpublished manuscript, Princeton University. Endogenous democratization. World Politics , Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics. Oxford University Press. Carnes, M. The welfare state in global perspective. Collier, P. Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxford Economic Papers , Connor, W.

The Quest for Understanding. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Cox, G. Making Votes Count. Duch, R. Comparative studies of the economy and the vote. Duverger, M. Political Parties. Fearon, J. Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. Ferejohn, J. Comparative judicial politics. Franzese, R. Multicausality, context-conditionality, and endogeneity. Frye, T. Economic transformation and comparative politics. Gandhi, J. Political Institutions under Dictatorship.

Geddes, B. Authoritarian breakdown: Unpublished manuscript, UCLA. What causes democratization? Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Gerring, J.

The case study: Greenfeld, L. National identity. Gurr, T. The revolution—social change nexus. Comparative Politics , 5: Hall, P. Mixed signals: Hardin, R. Compliance, consent, and legitimacy. Helmke, G.

The logic of strategic defection: Courts under Constraints: Judges, Generals, and Presidents in Argentina. Horowitz, D. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Los Angeles: University of California Press. Huntington, S. Political Order in Changing Societies.

New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press. Kalyvas, S. The Logic of Violence in Civil War. Civil wars. Keefer, P. The poor performance of poor democracies Ch. Lichbach, M. Mechanisms of globalized protest movements. Lipset, S. Some social requisites of democracy: Cleavage structures, party systems, and voter alignments. Lipset and S. Free Press. Magalone, B. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. Mahoney, J. Historical enquiry and comparative politics.

Maravall, J.

Accountability and the survival of governments. Midlarsky, M. Rulers and the ruled: Moore, B. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World.

Muller, E. Income inequality, regime repressiveness, and political violence.Read More The Letters Patent declared the Crown-appointed Governor to be the head of the government and ordered the formation of the Executive and Legislative Councils to assist in administration.

You will pick an argument and explore whether that argument explains your specific case through a careful application of the argument to evidence from your case. I am an Evaluator with a sample word and need to preview a program. States and power in Africa: Comparative lessons in authority and control. Stefan Gosepath and Prof. Akanksha Stevens Prize 2nd year Political Science By their second year, students may know they are heading toward a Political Science Major, Honours, Combined Major, or Minor program, and should therefore begin to focus their interests in particular areas of the discipline.

This journey has not been useless. The unification of Italy and Germany began because nationalism was starting to be used by conservatives to win support for the existing social order. The three-year war only ended up worsening the economy as there was no peasant production and crops plummeted as many people starved.

LYNNA from Huntington
Feel free to read my other posts. I have a variety of hobbies, like wine making. I do enjoy studying docunments recklessly .
>