THE MISSIONARY POSITION CHRISTOPHER HITCHENS PDF

adminComment(0)

The. Missionary. Position. •. Mother Teresa in Theory and Practice. CHRISTOPHER HITCHENS The right of Christopher Hitchens to be identified as the author. Editorial Reviews. bestthing.info Review. What's next--The Girl Scouts: The Untold Story? The Missionary Position: Mother Teresa in Theory and Practice by [Hitchens, Christopher] .. I've always believed that Christopher Hitchens' goal is not to bring your thinking in line with his; rather, it is to provoke your thought, your. Author, Christopher Hitchens Hitchens disclaims any argument with Mother Teresa herself and says that he is more concerned with the public view of her. In the foreword to The Missionary Position, he described these activities as "early polemics", part of "a battle" .. Create a book · Download as PDF · Printable version.


The Missionary Position Christopher Hitchens Pdf

Author:ADELINE WANDRIE
Language:English, Dutch, Japanese
Country:Samoa
Genre:Religion
Pages:202
Published (Last):23.08.2015
ISBN:472-1-67500-982-3
ePub File Size:25.40 MB
PDF File Size:10.61 MB
Distribution:Free* [*Sign up for free]
Downloads:21998
Uploaded by: JOSELYN

The missionary position: Mother Teresa in theory and practice. byHitchens But what, asks Christopher Hitchens, makes Mother Teresa so divine? In a frank expose of the Borrow this book to access EPUB and PDF files. Among his many books, perhaps none have sparked more outrage than The Missionary Position, Christopher Hitchens's meticulous study of the life and deeds. PDF - The Missionary Position. In this book Christopher Hitchens writes about Mother Teresa's life and work. The book criticizes Teresa as a political opportunist.

If this sounds like nonsense, well, it is. But it is also the way Christopher Hitchens looks at Mother Teresa. Christopher Hitchens is a British transplant, a political pundit who has written a column for the Nation magazine for decades. The Nation, for the unacquainted, is a magazine that would put a smile on the face of Joseph Stalin. Having spent his entire adult life on the wrong side of history, he has become a very bitter and angry man. Why does Hitchens hate Mother Teresa?

Like Mother Teresa, Hitchens is troubled by poverty. Unlike her, he does nothing about it. Hitchens would prefer to grant the award to ideology, namely to the politics of socialism. More than this, it is her Catholicism that drives him mad. As expected, Mother Teresa has won scores of awards from all over the world.

This bothers Hitchens. What has she done with the money earned from the awards? Because that would take work. Worse than that, he would then have to confront the truth. This is why he would rather imply that Mother Teresa is sticking the loot in her pocket.

His book, by the way, is a 98 page essay printed on eight-and-a-half by five-and-a-half inch paper, one that is so small it could easily fit into the opening of a sewer. It contains no footnotes, no citations of any kind. Rather, it is associated with the gossip pages of, say, a Vanity Fair. From this perspective, Robin Hood is a game that only collectivists can play.

The missionary position : Mother Teresa in theory and practice

Keating gave Mother Teresa one and a quarter million dollars. It does not matter to Hitchens that all of the money was spent before anyone ever knew of his shenanigans. What matters is that Mother Teresa gave to the poor a lot of money taken from a rich guy who later went to jail. Keating has done much to help the poor, which is why I am writing to you on his behalf. He begins one chapter quoting Mother Teresa on why her congregation has taken a special vow to work for the poor.

Ours has to be a free service, and to the poor. He knows full well that there is a world of difference between soliciting money from the rich and working for them. And precisely whom should she—or anyone else—accept money from, if not the rich? Would it make Hitchens feel better if the middle class were tapped and the rich got off scot free? Would it make any sense to take from the poor and then give it back to them? On this, he is bipartisan.

As such, he objects to Mother Teresa being photographed with them. Now if only she had posed with the characters who hangout at the Marxist Institute for Policy Studies a favorite Hitchens cell , she would have escaped his wrath altogether. For example, in she went to comfort the suffering in Bhopal after a Union Carbide chemical explosion. Other editions.

Enlarge cover.

See a Problem?

Error rating book. Refresh and try again. Open Preview See a Problem? Details if other: Thanks for telling us about the problem. Return to Book Page. The Missionary Position: Among his many books, perhaps none have sparked more outrage than The Missionary Position , Christopher Hitchens's meticulous study of the life and deeds of Mother Teresa.

You might also like: THE SECRET LIBRO PDF

A Nobel Peace Prize recipient beatified by the Catholic Church in , Mother Teresa of Calcutta was celebrated by heads of state and adored by millions for her work on behalf of the poor.

In his measure Among his many books, perhaps none have sparked more outrage than The Missionary Position , Christopher Hitchens's meticulous study of the life and deeds of Mother Teresa. In his measured critique, Hitchens asks only that Mother Teresa's reputation be judged by her actions-not the other way around.

With characteristic elan and rhetorical dexterity, Hitchens eviscerates the fawning cult of Teresa, recasting the Albanian missionary as a spurious, despotic, and megalomaniacal operative of the wealthy who long opposed measures to end poverty, and fraternized, for financial gain, with tyrants and white-collar criminals throughout the world.

Get A Copy. Paperback , 1st Edition , 98 pages. Published April 17th by Verso first published More Details Original Title. Buckley, Jr. Other Editions 5. Friend Reviews. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

To ask other readers questions about The Missionary Position , please sign up. This question contains spoilers… view spoiler [what did she gave to very sick people suffering huge pains? Dave Clarke nothing, that's kinda of the point, in her twisted ideology, pain and suffering brought you closer to her imaginary friend in the sky See 1 question about The Missionary Position….

Lists with This Book. Community Reviews. Showing Rating details. Sort order.

I liked this book when I read it twenty years ago, appreciating it as a wicked piece of invective. He shows us a woman who, although she claimed to be apolitical, never met an oppr I liked this book when I read it twenty years ago, appreciating it as a wicked piece of invective.

Keating donated 1. Hitchens quotes eyewitness testimony: Mother Teresa who herself, it should be noted, has checked into some of the finest and costliest clinics and hospitals in the West during her bouts with heart trouble and old age once gave this game away in a filmed interview.

She described a person who was in the last agonies of cancer and suffering unbearable pain. With a smile, Mother Teresa told the camer what she told this terminal patient: So Jesus must be kissing you. Personally, I think Hitchen is a bit too hard on Mother Teresa. Although, like Hitchens, I value reason and abhor superstition, I am more sympathetic to her core beliefs--if not her politics--than he is, and I am convinced that it was a sincere conviction that led her to her nursing philosophy however wrongheaded it may be.

Also, I am certain many poor people would have died alone, without any comfort or companionship,, if it had not been for the ministrations of Mother and her sisters. Still, this is a powerful and memorable book, and cautions all of us to be suspicious of religious beliefs when they are summoned to service and then applied to a particular political agenda. Her world travels are not the wanderings of a pilgrim but a campaign which accords with the requirements of power.

View all 25 comments. Mar 18, BlackOxford rated it it was amazing Shelves: Money Does Smell Usually Badly Puncturing the self-inflated balloons of hypocritical cant is always entertaining. And Mother Teresa is right up there with Donald Trump when it comes to the latest fashion in imperial new clothes.

Charity is its own reward or it is bunk. And anyone who sets charity up as a business becomes a huckster and seller of snake oil whatever they started out as. This is a law of nature and Hitchens confirms it magnificently in this wonderfully written case study.

It is emp Money Does Smell Usually Badly Puncturing the self-inflated balloons of hypocritical cant is always entertaining. This is the point when the idealist becomes the victim of his own hubris. And also the point when others are enrolled in the cause. As every entrepreneur knows, organisations are a bitch. They sap your strength and immerse everyone involved in political conflict. Jesus discovered this cruel reality - the immediate distortion of himself and his message - as soon as he had assembled his motley Apostles and sent them on the road.

And the Apostles themselves were clearly confused about the points to be made and their authority to make them. Eventually that confusion would be resolved by calling for devotion to the Church as the message. The result, we understand now, is a fixation on corporate reputation with practical consequences that range from the promotion of religious warfare to the protection of paedophilia. Not that Mother Teresa started with motivations as pure as those of Jesus.

She was also a malicious control freak who imposed what she regarded as a therapeutic level of suffering on her charges as well as her staff. Certainly their claims to special personal revelation are on a par with each other. Their abilities to harvest the loose change of the rich and famous are comparable. Their affinities for right-wing government thugs are hard to distinguish. But at least Billy Graham kept accounts and was audited on occasion.

No one knows how much Mother Teresa collected in her global ministry, how it was spent, and where it is now. Only one thing is certain: View all 21 comments.

Actually, this is a follow-up read to Mother Teresa: The Untold Story by Dr. Aroup Chatterjee, where he took apart the myth of this modern day saint with great precision. There, this book as well as the documentary by Hitchens were mentioned, which immediately whetted my appetite to read it. But whereas in Dr. Chatterjee's book, the approach is pedantic and clinical, Hitchens's tome is a no-holds-barred attack on the icon.

In cricketing parlance, Mother Teresa: The Untold Story is a test match: Hitchens's aim is clear. He is out to discredit the saintly icon built up over the years by the international press and the Catholic church, and he is not going to do it gently: Who would be so base as to pick on a wizened, shriveled old lady, well stricken in years, who has consecrated her entire life to the needy and the destitute?

Lone self-sacrificing zealot, or chair of a missionary multinational? The scale alters with the perspective, and the perspective alters with the scale. Also, this is only a small part of the continuing offensive of reason against blind faith. This is a small episode in an unending argument between those who know they are right and therefore claim the mandate of heaven, and those who suspect that the human race has nothing but the poor candle of reason by which to light its way.

Duvalier, the wife of the Haitian dictator Jean Francois "Papa Doc" Duvalier, a cruel and corrupt blackguard of no small proportions. It also touches upon her friendship with John-Roger, the leader of a dangerous cult. There are many rascals that this saint has endorsed: Is it plain naivete, as her devotees claim? Or is it the fat cheques or other favours that these individuals are willing to contribute to the Mother's mission?

We will discover Mother Teresa keeping company with several other frauds, crooks and exploiters as this little tale unfolds. At what point—her apologists might want to permit themselves this little tincture of skepticism—does such association cease to be coincidental?

Christopher Hitchens: The Missionary Position: Mother Teresa in Theory and Practice

Or to put it more simply - when do we start calling a spade a spade? As the subtitle makes clear, Mother Teresa is a missionary bent on proselytisation. That is her aim in life - all else, the hospitals, the orphanages, the care for the destitute and dying - are only the tools of the trade. According to the author, the myth of the saintly mother was created by Malcolm Muggeridge through a dubious "miracle" - and he also built up her reputation as a kind of angel patrolling the streets of a hellish Calcutta; and in the process of building her up, he trashed Calcutta.

Muggeridge did such a good job of propaganda in his movie so that anyone who looks critically at Mother Teresa's reputation does so at his own peril. Ever since Something Beautiful for God , the critic of Mother Teresa, in small things as well as in great ones, has had to operate against an enormous weight of received opinion, a weight made no easier to shift by the fact that it is made up, quite literally, of illusion.

But according to Hitchens, "Mother Teresa has never pretended that her work is anything but a fundamentalist religious campaign.

The conversion of as many people as possible to Catholicism. A relentless campaign against abortion and contraception. For this, she used all the tricks of the trade - and her proximity to powerful political figures and crooked capitalists helped her along.

Hitch spends the remaining part of the book in detailing, with evidence, Mother Teresa's real mission and how she went about it. And Pope John Paul II, who was beatifying and canonising with a sort of divine frenzy, couldn't wait to convert her into a saint. It makes for fascinating reading. The faithful will no doubt find loopholes in all of them: But that should not prevent those who think rationally from subjecting her myth to the harsh light of truth.

She has herself purposely blurred the supposed distinction between the sacred and the profane, to say nothing of the line that separates the sublime from the ridiculous. It is past time that she was subjected to the rational critique that she has evaded so arrogantly and for so long.

A short and pithy read for questing minds. To give a few examples, the millions she took from the mega swindler Keating and never returned, her response to the Dupont chemical spill in India instead of seeking justice and calling to make Dupont acountable was telling people to "just forgive" so as not to cause any problems with the globalist corporats.

Then of course there were the notoriously deplorable conditions in her hospitals and shelters, totally filthy, where they not only reused needles but their idea of sterilizing them was washing them with cold water! Also people were not given proper pain medication Mother Teresa had this idea that the more you suffered the closer you were to Christ! When the city of San Francisco donated a fully furnished shelter to her for a shelter for homeless men who had AIDS she promptly had all the couchs, beds and televisions thrown out insuring that the dying would live as comfortless as possible.

See a Problem?

All I can say is thankfully this cash cow for the forces of evil in this world is dead! View all 3 comments. Jul 03, K rated it liked it Shelves: Mother Teresa is probably the last person I'd expect to be the target of an angry expose. In this short volume, Christopher Hitchens includes the following points: Much of the publicity around Mother Teresa is revisionistic and dubious, and her displays of humility are an act.

How humble is it to claim a personal relationship with Jesus? Mother Teresa is about saving souls, not bodies. Her institutions are unsanitary and poorly operated despite a plethora of donations which should make better Mother Teresa is probably the last person I'd expect to be the target of an angry expose. Her institutions are unsanitary and poorly operated despite a plethora of donations which should make better conditions affordable.

Mother Teresa's statements about the godliness of poverty and suffering appear to be her justification for this. Mother Teresa uses her influence to promote anti-birth control and anti-abortion dogmas, despite the fact that overpopulation and unwanted children are likely factors in the need for her institutions.

She actually tried to advocate for the latter as he was being prosecuted for fraud; when Keating's prosecutor informed Mother Teresa of Keating's activities and encouraged her to return the funds he donated to her cause so that these funds could then be returned to the defrauded individuals, Mother Teresa never responded. Mother Teresa is a font of unhelpful platitudes which do not hold up to scrutiny but are viewed as profound simply because she said them.

Mother Teresa and the West feed off each other. The West feels a need to believe they are helping the poor savages of the East; Mother Teresa publicly fills that need for them independent of the degree of help she is actually contributing. Hitchens' writing is sharp and on-target, and he certainly makes an interesting case.

I also appreciated the book's short length. With that, my sense is that Hitchens' anti-religious agenda is the driving force behind this book rather than any actual wrongdoing on Mother Teresa's part.

Mother Teresa's alleged false modesty, while hardly admirable, is certainly no crime. Her embracing poverty and suffering at the expense of those she is officially helping is more problematic; at the same time, it's not as if she's using the donated funds for her own material pleasure. Mother Teresa is a religious figure and does not claim otherwise; it's only natural that she would promote anti-abortion views and consort indiscriminately with despised characters, feeling that God loves everybody.

As for the inflated and uncritical view of her platitudes, as Hitchens himself remarks, this is " If Mother Teresa is the adored object of many credulous and uncritical observers, then the blame is not hers, or hers alone.

View all 12 comments. Nov 12, Mikey B. A forceful and convincing if somewhat strident destruction of the myth of Mother Teresa. One of the most convincing is the squalor of the hospices in Calcutta and elsewhere. Very little of the donated money and this is in the millions goes into improving the facilities. Aspirins are the only anaesthetics provided to terminally ill patients. Needles are recycled on different patients.

Unremitting suffering i A forceful and convincing if somewhat strident destruction of the myth of Mother Teresa. Unremitting suffering is seen as ennobling and medical care is not a priority. In these hospices the attendants are not to question their roles — they are part of the Mother Teresa cult. She espouses the most rigid doctrines of the Catholic Church as in her Nobel Prize winning speech — she is against any form of contraceptive use and lashes out that abortion is the worst sin.

What has Mother Teresa done to empower the people of Calcutta, to educate them and to prevent them from dying in the streets? She is treating the end effect. Where has all the money gone from the donations? View all 11 comments. Hitchens has turned his humbuggery on little old nuns. Well played, Hitchens. Well played. As much as I'd like to just keep the review at that, I feel compelled to continue with an actual review.

His complaints focus on several facets of her organization. While she devoted her life to helping the poor, her goal was conversion rather than actually improving the lives of the poor. Despite the millions of dollars donated to her organization, she actively stood in the way of high-quality healt Hitchens has turned his humbuggery on little old nuns.

Despite the millions of dollars donated to her organization, she actively stood in the way of high-quality healthcare for her clinics, and kept them poor and struggling to treat those in need in interest of ascetic soul-strengthening. Much of the donated money went to missionary causes, and there was no transparency to the finances in the organization. She accepted money from anyone, and traded her influence as a "good person" for money from corrupt politicians or political regimes.

She actively opposed and spoke out against birth control of any type, despite the fact that Indian overpopulation was one of the contributing factors to rampant poverty in Calcutta.

She denied use of strong painkillers or antibiotics on principle. This led to far more suffering than was necessary, and made what should have been minor issues life-threatening due to infection that went untreated. Her repeated rejection of "worldly interests" mostly kept people from critically investigating the work she was doing. It also led to huge donations from governments as well as individuals, which were then not used efficiently to actually help the poor.

While working to help the poor, she did nothing to alleviate poverty, and even encouraged the current status quo: I think the world is being much helped by the suffering of the poor people. Many of these were due to Mother Teresa's view that God would look after his flock despite the fact that God's care is what put them in need of help , and that suffering would bring them closer to Jesus.

This caused her to turn away medical professionals and expertise in the interest of volunteers who often knew nothing of medicine. Much of the criticism Hitchens quoted came from medical professionals who had visited her clinics and were appalled at the unnecessary suffering of patients.

I found this all very interesting, and it seems like a sad example of a major religious figure with seriously skewed priorities. It is sad that her reputation stopped any serious investigation of her methods or motivations.

While not a fun read, I'd certainly recommend this. It's a sobering way to temper the traditional saintly view of her. View 2 comments. The day she was made a saint, I revisited Hell's Angel. From the blurb: In his measured critique, Hitchens asks only that Mother Teresa's reputation be judged by her actions-not the other way arou From the blurb: He was a one-man-band against the 'evils' of the world and collected a global following which defied logic and common sense.

Hitchens initially wanted to title the book, Sacred Cow , which would have been typical of his satirical onslaught. He tackled issues which defines history, and attracted debate and headlines. He was a seasoned Leftist journalist who knew his craft. The results were brutal, leaving no room for prisoners.

He left no stone upturned to expose Mother Theresa as no saint, more like a fraud, a liar and a thief. Add his other intellectual warfare against religions as 'despotism of the sky' to the message in this book, and its becomes understandable why Mother Theresa, as the icon for what was noble and holy to the world of the religious enclaves, became one of his primary targets.

His book God Is Not Great - how religion poisons everything became an international bestseller. Hitch, a neo-atheist, became a crusader against 'clerical and theocratical bullying'.

Religion, according to him, included 'nuclear-armed mullahs, as well as insidious campaigns to have stultifying pseudo-science taught in American schools. Nothing escapes the crocodile-snapping wrath of Hitchens, and in this case it was as effective as was planned. Hitchens implied in the book that Mother Theresa had a sadistic streak.

He used the show-don't-tell principle to illustrate his point. She refused dying people medical treatment, believed in severe pain as a sign of a person's nearness to God, and ripped all items which could make their last days comfortable, from their lives, while stashing millions of dollars away in bank accounts which was meant for the poor and sick in her care.

She withheld food from both the patients as well as the volunteers and sisters in her employment.

Needles were not sterilized, only rinsed in cold water, etc. To Hitchens she was nothing better than the televangelists who ripped people off under the guise of religion. Mother Theresa was a calculating money-making-machine who knew exactly what she was doing.

So if you are interested in this controversial smear against one of the greatest icons of all times, this is the book for you. I have read several rumors about Mother Theresa through the years and was curious. It's that other side of the pancake again. However, I realized the modus operandi of the author from within his ideological framework and took that seriously into account in rating this book.

Therefore, 4 stars it will be. Mar 07, A. Howard rated it liked it Shelves: Despite the pure shock power of the title, Hitchens' originally preferred title may have been more appropriate, The Missionary Position , by the sake of its cover alone, is arguably one of the most bold polemics in recent memory.

View all 8 comments. There is no conceit equal to false modesty" is my year of Hitch. What a pleasure. My only quibble is at pages with a large font, it is quite a bit shorter than I was expecting.

Surely there was plenty more meat on the carcass for him to sink his teeth into? The Missionary Position is more an extended journal article than a book in its own right. Luckily, I have god is not Great on hand to fill the void.

May 10, Ashish Iyer rated it it was amazing Shelves: This book is quite shocking and insightful book for me. A well-researched and excellently written book that exposes the monster and charlatan that was Mother Teresa.

It left me disturbed for a while as I digested the information provided to me after years of research and hard work. This book made me think about a lot of things and raised a lot of questions. Mother Theresa had only one thing in mind to "save people for Jesus.

The conditions in her This book is quite shocking and insightful book for me. The conditions in her homes was unhygienic and filthy. The sisters of Charity would "baptise" people who were at death's door to see that they "went to heaven". No one had knowledge of medicine.

She became a 'Saint' by serving the poor of Calcutta. Christopher Hitchens has removed the veil of Sainthood from the much publicized and adored Nobel Peace Prize winner and looked at her critically by analyzing stone cold facts.

They had bulk of money but they wouldn't spend on poor or even improve the facility. In fact, Mother Teresa consistently resisted any moves to have adequate medical care there, while she availed herself of the best hospitals in the Western world when she was battling her own medical ailments.

Once you read this book, Mother Teresa will appear to be no more than an opportunistic and religious fundamentalist whose love for religious dogma far exceeded her love for the poor. All facts are right there. Highly recommended. View all 4 comments. I enjoy reading books that plausibly and intelligently challenge commonly held beliefs. Until I r I enjoy reading books that plausibly and intelligently challenge commonly held beliefs.

Until I read his book, I assumed that this benefactor of the poor in Calcutta, who was born of Albanian parentage in the Macedonian city of Skopje, was a saintly character. Now, I have serious doubts. It seems that little she did actually made much material or physical or medical difference to the poor.

Hitchens and others provide evidence that the medical care offered to those who sought her help was largely ineffective if not outdated. Hitchens quotes evidence that helpers in the Calcutta mission were instructed to mop the foreheads of the dying as if they were actually soothing them, when in reality they were quietly baptising the sufferers before they passed away. Whilst proselytising might not harm the poor many low-caste Indians have benefited materially by becoming Christians , damning abortion and birth-control is unlikely to alleviate the lives of the impoverished.

Hitchens wonders what became of those funds, but can provide no answers. She was beloved by the rich and famous and also infamous. This was soon before the Duvaliers fled to the French Riviera. It is essential reading for those interested in modern India, and also of some interest to those interested in the Balkans.

There is no record of her having said a word against this man who tyrannised and killed many of his subjects for over 40 years. View 1 comment. Mar 05, Michael Perkins rated it really liked it. The claims of poverty by Mother Teresa and her order. The reality, as attested by many former members of her order, is that the organization had millions of dollars in bank accounts that were at their beck and call. Some of the money came from various prizes Mother Teresa received.

When Keating was on trial for his crimes, Mother Teresa sent a letter to the court asking for clemency. The prosecutor never heard back. Having been raised Roman Catholic and having a strong knowledge of Church history, I had planned a longer review, however, this is a short book that could be read in an afternoon and urge those who have interest to give it a shot.

Marcial Maciel Degollado, whose resume of crimes reads like that of the Devil himself The great polemicist Christopher Hitchens turns his attention to Agnes Bojaxhiu, aka Mother Teresa, in this searing look into her work that is universally accepted as humanitarian and above reproach. Teresa, despite supposedly caring for the poor, does little for them - she demands that they accept their lot and live with poverty rather than try to help them escape it.

This is a woman whose fame rests upon her help with the poor, and yet she failed to use her power and influence to alleviate their suffering by encouraging the many world leaders she met to work on this issue. And yet she often involved herself in politics, especially when it came to the subject of abortion. She travelled to Spain to protest when post-Franco legislation was to be passed regarding the legalisation of divorce, abortion, and birth control, and even spoke to Margaret Thatcher about passing a bill that was in the House of Commons that wanted to limit the availability of abortions.

Maybe the biggest criticism of Mother Teresa above all is the way she and her order withheld painkillers from the very sick and dying.

Teresa, it seems, was unaware of the irony of that comment. Hitchens also raises the question of what Teresa did with the millions she received in donations. And a lot of the donations came from questionable sources like Charles Keating, a fraud who was imprisoned for 10 years for his part in the Savings and Loans scandal in the early 90s. He never received a reply to his letter and the money was not refunded.

The first half of this book is basically a retelling of the documentary. Jan 26, Kurt Pankau rated it it was ok. This is an ambitious attempt at iconoclasm from a world-class iconoclast that is absolutely undone by the author's style of writing. From the overly catty title to the confused layout, the book is frustrating when it should be enlightening and only works for about fifteen pages in the middle when substance is finally allowed to triumph over style. Hitchens has some fantastic observations about the misguided ways in which Mother Theresa "helps" the poor but in fact just makes them suffer.

Those fi This is an ambitious attempt at iconoclasm from a world-class iconoclast that is absolutely undone by the author's style of writing. Those fifteen pages are worth reading, without question. But he works them towards a flimsy thesis that Mother Theresa was some kind of diabolical genius.

In doing so, he assumes that the reader knows quite a bit about Mother Theresa and the Catholic Church already, and disdains them both.

His scattershot rambling approach to an argument really does him no justice. It's a boon to his work as an essayist, but it's the reason his books are all slight, pithy, and dense. This book needed to guide the reader, but Hitchens never constructs anything like a narrative. I view this as a blown opportunity.

The evidence of Mother Theresa's woes on humanity are not hard to find. You can see a nice overview in the "Criticism" section of her Wikipedia page. Her goal was not to heal but to convert. She would give deathbed baptisms to Hindus and Muslims without their explicit consent. She would deny antibiotics to the sick and painkillers to the dying--she seemed to think suffering was making her charges more Christ-like.

People suffered needlessly under her care. There is no question that she did horrible things and was never held to account by the world at large. But the stronger argument is not that Mother Theresa was a bad person, but that she was an exemplary Catholic and that Catholic doctrine writ large is as great an evil now as it was during the Inquisition. Hitchens dances around this, but never quite nails it.

The Catholic prohibition on contraception--largely ignored in the first world--is one of the issues Mother Theresa championed alongside abortion. And to this day those prohibitions are a direct cause of the third world being flush with the starving children that Mother Theresa's nuns look after. The irony is flabbergasting, but Hitchens would have us believe that it's all part of some evil scheme towards beatification, and I don't think he argued it strongly enough.

It pains me to rate this as low as I did. I'm a fan of Christopher Hitchens and view his death as a serious loss to the intellectual world. But this is far from his best work.She was a friend of poverty " and "a friend to the worst of the rich". View all 21 comments. However, when Mr. This rather oblique compliment belongs to a more serious age. I'm a fan of Christopher Hitchens and view his death as a serious loss to the intellectual world. They're not being given painkillers really beyond aspirin and maybe if you're lucky some Brufen or something, for the sort of pain that goes with terminal cancer and the things they were dying of Many more people are poor and sick because of the life of MT: The result, we understand now, is a fixation on corporate reputation with practical consequences that range from the promotion of religious warfare to the protection of paedophilia.

Here I can claim no special standing. Or to put it more simply - when do we start calling a spade a spade?

ALANNA from Toledo
See my other articles. I have always been a very creative person and find it relaxing to indulge in wing chun. I do like sharing PDF docs obediently .
>