THE FILM What the #$*! (BLEEP) Do We Know!? has gained national attention and sparked a questioning of thorny assumptions such as: What is the nature of. —Albert Einstein Welcome to tine Wliat tine Bleep Do We Know!? Transcending the Limits of Time bestthing.info bestthing.info quantum mechanics are, as far as we know, always exactly right, they tell us . Sciences, and can be downloaded in several formats (I recommend PDF) from.
|Language:||English, Dutch, Arabic|
|Genre:||Politics & Laws|
|ePub File Size:||22.66 MB|
|PDF File Size:||17.76 MB|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Sign up for free]|
Are you searching for [PDF] What the Bleep Do We Know Quantum Physics Books? Finally [PDF] What the Bleep Do We Know Quantum. Get Free Read & Download Files What The Bleep Do We Know Quantum Physics PDF. WHAT THE BLEEP DO WE KNOW QUANTUM PHYSICS. Download. Bleep Do We Know!? To offer concrete evidence for their claims, the filmmakers point to discover- ies in quantum physics. But does physics really provide the.
According to the makers of the film, "Bleep" is an expurgation of " fuck ". The Institute of Noetic Sciences , a New Age research organization that "explores phenomena that do not necessarily fit conventional scientific models", has supported What the Bleep Do We Know!?
According to Publishers Weekly , the film was one of the sleeper hits of , as "word-of-mouth and strategic marketing kept it in theaters for an entire year. In the Publishers Weekly article, publicist Linda Rienecker of New Page Books says that she sees the film's success as part of a wider phenomenon, stating "A large part of the population is seeking spiritual connections, and they have the whole world to choose from now". They'll take a little bit of Buddhism, a little bit of veganism, a little bit of astrology They're coming into the marketplace hungry for direction, but they don't want some person who claims to have all the answers.
They want suggestions, not formulas. Suddenly people who were talking about subatomic particles are alluding to alternate universes and cosmic forces, all of which can be harnessed in the interest of making Ms. Matlin's character feel better about her thighs. In the letter, the authors write: There's nothing wrong with that. It's recognized as pedagogical exaggeration. But the movie gradually moves to quantum 'insights' that lead a woman to toss away her antidepressant medication, to the quantum channeling of Ramtha, the 35,year-old Lemurian warrior, and on to even greater nonsense.
Richard Dawkins stated that "the authors seem undecided whether their theme is quantum theory or consciousness. Both are indeed mysterious, and their genuine mystery needs none of the hype with which this film relentlessly and noisily belabours us", concluding that the film is "tosh".
Professor Clive Greated wrote that "thinking on neurology and addiction are covered in some detail but, unfortunately, early references in the film to quantum physics are not followed through, leading to a confused message".
Despite his caveats, he recommends that people see the film, stating: Science and engineering are important for our future, and anything that engages the public can only be a good thing. Bernie Hobbs, a science writer with ABC Science Online, explains why the film is incorrect about quantum physics and reality: It comes from the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle , and it's about the limitations of trying to measure the position and momentum of subatomic particles It's there.
The sub-atomic particles that make up the atoms that make up the rock are there too. Hobbs further disputed the film's use of the ten percent of the brain myth. David Albert , a philosopher of physics who appears in the film, has accused the filmmakers of selectively editing his interview to make it appear that he endorses the film's thesis that quantum mechanics is linked with consciousness.
He says he is "profoundly unsympathetic to attempts at linking quantum mechanics with consciousness". In the film, during a discussion of the influence of experience on perception, Candace Pert notes a story, which she says she believes is true, of Native Americans being unable to see Columbus 's ships because they were outside their experience. According to an article in Fortean Times by David Hambling, the origins of this story likely involved the voyages of Captain James Cook , not Columbus, and an account related by Robert Hughes which said Cook's ships were " Hambling says it is likely that both the Hughes account and the story told by Pert were exaggerations of the records left by Captain Cook and the botanist Joseph Banks.
Skeptic James Randi described the film as "a fantasy docudrama " and "[a] rampant example of abuse by charlatans and cults". This book is truly irresponsible, as it tricks gullible people who are curious about the deeper aspects of life into believing a litany of absurd things. It is basically anti-science and solipsism. I intend to review this book at length once I have more time and have my thoughts in order.
I plan to make use of all or nearly all of the 20, characters I am allowed. Dec 17, AuthorsOnTourLive!
With the help of more than a dozen research and theoretical scientists, this book takes readers through the looking glass of quantum physics into a universe that is more bizarre and alive than ever imagined. This science leads not just to the material world, but deep Will Arntz, a research physicist and spirtual seeker, and co-creator of the movie What the Bleep Do We Know!?
This science leads not just to the material world, but deep into the realm of spirituality, and offers mind stretching questions and details endless possibilities for individual reality. Nov 02, Therese rated it it was amazing. This book will make you think. In depth look at quantum physics and then some. The movie has great graphics and is a lovely accompaniment.
Dit boek heb ik al bijna 13 jaar in de kast staan. Ik wilde dit boek echt heel erg graag hebben, dus toen ik uit dienst ging bij een voormalig werkgever en mijn collega's vroegen wat ik als afscheidscadeau wilde hebben zei ik dat ik dit boek wilde hebben.
En ik was ook heel erg blij toen ik het kreeg. Nu heb ik 'm eindelijk ui Dit boek heb ik al bijna 13 jaar in de kast staan. Nu heb ik 'm eindelijk uit hoera! Ik ben natuurlijk in de 13 jaar veranderd, ik kijk anders tegen het leven aan of heeft het onderwerp mij gewoon nooit geboeid en kreeg ik het daarom nooit uitgelezen? View 2 comments. Nov 02, Almi added it. As universal as the question of our origin is the question of reality.
People are forever seeking the reality. Some try to find answers in religion, some in science, and some accept trad alright i haven't read the book, but i watched the movie..
Some try to find answers in religion, some in science, and some accept traditions told through generations, etc. Little do they know that they are the ones creating their own realities. Amanda symbolizes millions of us who are unhappy and unsettled with our present lives — those who believe that there is more to life but do not know where to find it.
Her deafness symbolizes our fettered state of mind. We accept only those we perceive as acceptable just like how she reads lips and gives meaning that is subject to her interpretation. We screen what we see as reality. As her life unravels, with the help of events and unusual characters, she learns the potential of thought and turns self-hate to self-love. Matter as we first believed to be composed of solid atoms is actually not solid at the quantum level.
It is composed of spaces where wave-like energy goes in and out of existence. The answer according to Mr.
He proved that the way people think positive or negative , can change the chemical structure of water. After the scene, the audience is left with a thought-stimulating statement: Another proof of the power of thought is how meditation reduced crime rates as told by one of the scientists interviewed in the film.
Thought is indeed that powerful, even god-like. And being able to think or having consciousness is inherent in all of us. It is just up to us how we will use it. Many, like Amanda, failed to maximize their power of thought and create realities for themselves. This is because we select our realities from those that are familiar to us. We fail to and oftentimes choose not to consider the infinite number of possibilities of reality. We feel uncomfortable with unfamiliar things and label them as non-existent or not possible.
We need to do away with this immature state of mind and then take control our thoughts, our own realities. We have the tendency to be addicted to certain peptides or neurotransmitters released by our brain. We associate certain emotions with things or events. We base them on past emotional experiences. Amanda in the story, associated churches with negative emotions because she was betrayed by her husband.
She sees churches as a place full of lies and unfaithfulness, which is obviously not true. We also need to avoid this way of thinking and be more rational. We are not just beings determined by genetic coding, family, society and other external forces. It is actually the other way around. Who and what we think we are determines our being. It comes from inside, from our thoughts. We are beings who can make our own realities through our own choice. Aug 03, Jack rated it it was amazing. You must have an open mind in order to really get something useful out of this book.
It is a supplement to the movie of the same name and it's successor, "Down the Rabbit Hole. In fact, much criticism surrounds it and its contributors.
I have a very open mind about most things, and this is one of them. However, I do not take mu You must have an open mind in order to really get something useful out of this book. However, I do not take much of the content to be absolute truth.
I do not, however, regard the theories or proposals as pure hogwash either. There is always room for wonder. When backed up by some prominent names in the scientific community, more consideration must be given.
Regardless of whether or not you believe what is said in the book, it is an interesting read, albeit hard to get through at times due to massive thinking required. This is not to say it is hard to understand, it is just that you won't zip through the pages because you have to really think about what you are reading.
Skeptics will criticize, and perhaps condemn the material, but those with a mind for wondering and consideration of things we don't understand will enjoy a new perspective on the question of "Why are we here? One note that doesn't usually come up in a review of a book This is a very small book, but it's one of the heaviest books I've read.
It is printed exclusively on photo-quality paper with a weight to match. Just an interesting note. Pick it up and see the movie. You will be thinking more than you are used to. You'll either really enjoy it, or you'll just give up. Mar 01, carl theaker rated it really liked it Shelves: A fascinating look that blends and compares the makings of the universe, as science knows it, and spirituality. The creators, of the movie not the universe, then followed up with this book, which goes further in examining the questions of life, and well, everything.
The first half of the book concentrates on the science, quantum physics, fortunately for me, in layman terms. The second part delves into religion and spirituality. It wraps up i A fascinating look that blends and compares the makings of the universe, as science knows it, and spirituality. It wraps up in a self-help context, though not with specific advice, but in how the various questions raised can help you to make sense of the world.
I liked the 'it makes you think' attitude. I see that my library has a copy of the movie, can't wait to view it. Jul 14, Suzanne rated it did not like it. I am actually astounded by how many people like this book. After reading a boat load of books on layman's quantum theory, then reading this work, I smiled and laughed all the way through it.
This book is twisting the thought experiments that are presented by quantum theorists, taking the entire concept, wadding it up into a neat little package then taking a giant leap from quantum theory into the macro universe. I've never seen such a leap of faith in either spiritualism OR scientific study.
Thi I am actually astounded by how many people like this book. This book is absolutely foolish. Apr 30, Tyra rated it it was amazing.
If you are a seeker or a wondered, just read. It is thought provoking and that is what it is meant to do. Don't take yourself or your beliefs too seriously. It is a mysterious universe. We will never have all the answers. This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
I need to watch the movie again. This was a good reminder of the concepts, but the visuals and interviews make things stick even more. It's been over 10 years since I last saw the movie. Lots of stuff to practice once you understand the concepts. Practice, practice, practice. Peo I need to watch the movie again. People wanted to know how nature works, not in order to control and dominate it, but to live in accord with its ebb and flow.
Newberg continues: It does that by inhibiting things. It does that by preventing certain responses and certain pieces of neural information from getting ultimately up into our consciousness, and by doing all of that, we ignore the chair that we're sitting in.
That is, screening out the known. Then there's screening out the unknown. If we see something the brain can't quite identify, we grab onto something similar "It's not a squirrel. We create the world we perceive.
When I open my eyes and look around, it is not 'the world' that I see, but the world my human sensory equipment is able to see, the world my belief system allows me to see, and the world that my emotions care about seeing or not seeing.
Dean Radin, there's a very good reason why we don't manifest things right away: As it turns out, though, most of the universe doesn't care, and that's why our individual little thoughts don't immediately go out and change the universe as we see it.
I can imagine that if that were the case, if each of us were so powerful that our fleeting whims would go out and affect the universe, we would go out and destroy ourselves almost instantly. The 'how' gets handled by the immensely interactive superintelligent universe that automatically responds to consciousness because that's what it is. The universe IS the computer that keeps track--that's why it's here. And if it can create self-repliciting, self-conscious life forms, it can fix a flat tire.
And how does this view make creation more conscious? Well, to many people the future is on the other side of a great wall, past which they cannot go. So those possibilities lurking out there are not seen, and when they do show up it's a surprise, or a shock. But realizing that those potentials are real, and they can be developed, manipulated and collapsed, takes us over the wall and into the future where the new you awaits. If it's the personality, then the creations are from the existing structures, habits, propensities, neuronets, and from that old personality structure, all that will be created is the same old, same old.
Creating what has already been is hardly creating. Or creating is coming from the higher self, the God self, in which case it's usually unconscious and the workings of some deeply buried karma. So while the creations are wonderful to the spirit, to the disconnected personality, they seem arbitrary, unfair, and give rise to the feelings of powerlessness and victimization.
Whereas this technique takes advantage of the moment of no-self, or, new-self. From this 'I' something truly new can be manifested. Something that you consciously create. And to create this way forever undoes the trap of victimization and disempowerment. This is the most practical aspect of CCR. It means that you have created your life and your world. You may bitch and moan because you can't seem to have what you want, when in fact, you do have what you want.
You are living the life you chose to live, the life you believed you could live. In short, says Satinover, 'Quantum mechanics allows for the intangible phenomenon of freedom to be woven into human nature. The entire operation of the human brain is underpinned by quantum uncertainty.
These processes form a nested hierarchy, an entire parallel computer at one scale being but a processing element in the next larger one. But Dr. Stapp thinks that this phenomenon may show how the insubstantial 'mind' controls the very substantial brain: It has been calculated that there are more possible connections in one human brain than there are atoms in the entire universe.
Even in a small brain, the workings are incredible. It's been estimated that to solve the problem of a bird landing on a branch in the wind, the largest supercomputer would take days to calculate a solution, if it could. This problem may be computationally unsolvable. Yet bird brains do it all the time, and in no time. The world is ultimately constructed out of elementary particles that behave in this curious way. Is there an ultimate observer? Can we be conscious of that observer? What would you see if you looked through the eyes of the ultimate observer?
Not so in quantum physics. You can measure a single electron's properties accurately, but not without producing imprecision in some other quantum attribute.
Quantum properties always come in "conjugate" pairs. When two properties have this special relationship, it is impossible to know about both of them at the same time with complete precision. Heisenberg's Uncertainty also know as the I ndeterminacy Principle says that if you measure a particle's position accurately, you must sacrifice an accurate knowledge of its momentum, and vice versa.
A relationship of the Heisenberg kind holds for all dynamic properties of elementary particles and it guarantees that any experiment involving the microscopic world will contain some unknowns. How are we affected by others' observations? Does every observer affect the world the same way? What causes differences? In a local reality, influences cannot travel faster than the speed of light. I n I rish physicist John Stewart Bell showed that any model of reality compatible with quantum theory must be nonlocal.
For quantum physics to work, information must travel not just faster than light, but instantaneously. Nonlocality suggests that everything in the universe is connected by information that can appear anywhere else, instantaneously. What are the implications of nonlocality on how we can know the world? How would this change our lives? The new theories systematically challenged all of the assumptions of classical physics: Reality faded away like the Cheshire cat because we now know that fundamental properties of the physical world are not fixed; the world changes in subtle ways depending on how we wish to observe it.
The objects we encounter in everyday life do not ordinarily exhibit obvious quantum effects because the strangeness of the microscopic world is effectively smoothed out through innumerable interactions with the environment. I ndeed, classical descriptions of nature are often good enough for mundane purposes. But those descriptions are an approximation of a more fundamental quantum world, leaving open the possibility that some aspects of observation may subtly persist even into classical domains.
Study Guide Quantum Reality Locality was replaced with nonlocality, the idea that objects that are apparently separate are actually connected instantaneously through space-time. With nonlocality it is no longer true that unmediated action at a distance is not possible. In fact, such actions are required. Causality has dissolved because the fixed arrow of time is now known to be a persistent illusion, a misapprehension sustained by the classical assumptions of an absolute space and time.
We now know that sequences of events depend on the perspectives technically called the frame of reference of the observers. Continuity has faded away because we now know that there are some discontinuities in the fabric of reality. Space and time are neither smooth nor contiguous. How did the experience affect you? What would it be like to feel quantum physics through the senses?
What are the implications? Look around you. Imagine that what you are seeing is just the tip of the iceberg, a "special limited portion of a larger fabric of reality. Look where there appears to be something and imagine that what appears solid is mostly space. Feel your hands. Consider how our hands are communicating in quantum language with the rest of the universe.
What do you notice? What Does it Mean? What does the phrase "we know" mean? It means that theoretical predictions were made, based on mathematical models, and then repeatedly demonstrated in experiments.
If the universe behaves according to the theories, then we are justified in believing that common sense is indeed a special, limited perspective of a much grander universe. The portrait of reality painted by relativity and quantum mechanics is so far from common sense that it raises problems of interpretation. The mathematics of the theories are precise, and the predictions work fantastically well. But translating mathematics into human terms, especially for quantum mechanics, has remained exceedingly difficult.
The perplexing implications of quantum mechanics were greeted with shock and awe by the developing scientists. Many physicists today believe that a proper explanation of reality in light of quantum mechanics and reliability requires radical revisions of one or more common-sense assumptions: Given the continuing confusions in interpreting quantum mechanics, some physicists refuse to accept the idea that reality can possibly be so perplexing, convoluted, or improbable- compared to common sense, that is.
And so they continue to believe, as did Einstein, that quantum mechanics must be incomplete and that once "fixed" it will be found that the classical assumptions are correct after all, and then all the quantum weirdness will go away. If we do, we assume it has no relevance to our particular interests. This is understandable and in most cases perfectly fine for practical purposes. But when it comes to understanding the nature of reality, it is useful to keep in mind that quantum mechanics describes the fundamental building blocks of nature, and the classical world is composed of those blocks too, whether we observe them or not.
The competing interpretations of quantum mechanics differ principally on which of the common-sense assumptions one is comfortable in giving up. Some of the more widely known interpretations of quantum mechanics include the Copenhagen I nterpretation.
Consciousness Creates Reality. Copenhagen I nterpretation - This is the orthodox interpretation of quantum mechanics, promoted by Danish physicist Niels Bohr thus the reference to Copenhagen, where Bohr's institute is located.
In an overly simplified form, it asserts that there is no ultimately knowable reality. In a sense, this interpretation may be thought of as a "don't ask-don't tell" approach that allows quantum mechanics to be used without having to care about what it means. According to Bohr, it means nothing, at least not in ordinary human terms. Wholeness - Einstein's protege David Bohm maintained that quantum mechanics reveals that reality is an undivided whole in which everything is connected in a deep way, transcending the ordinary limits of space and time.
Many Worlds - Physicist Hugh Everett proposed that when a quantum measurement is performed, every possible outcome will actualize. But in the process of actualizing, the universe will split into as many versions of itself as needed to accommodate all possible measurement results. Then each of the resulting universes is actually a separate universe. Popular television shows like Sliders and a few scenes in What the Bleep? Quantum Logic - This interpretation says that perhaps quantum mechanics is puzzling because our common sense assumptions about logic break down in the quantum realm.
Mathematician J ohn von Neumann developed a "wave logic" that could account for some of the puzzles of quantum theory without completely abandoning classical concepts. Concepts in quantum logic have been vigorously pursued by philosophers. NeoRealism - This was the position led by Einstein, who refused to accept any interpretation, including the Copenhagen I nterpretation, asserting that common sense reality does not exist.
The neorealists propose that reality consists of objects familiar to classical physics, and thus the paradoxes of quantum mechanics reveal the presence of flaws in the theory. This view is also known as the "hidden variable" interpretation of quantum mechanics, which assumes that once we discover all the missing factors the paradoxes will go away. Consciousness Creates Reality - This interpretation pushes to the extreme the idea that the act of measurement, or possibly even human consciousness, is associated with the formation of reality.
This provides the act of observation an especially privileged role of collapsing the possible into the actual. Many mainstream physicists regard this interpretation as little more than wishful New Age thinking, but not all.
A few physicists have embraced this view and have developed descriptive variations of quantum theory that do accommodate such ideas. Study Guide Quantum Reality 7 Which interpretation appeals to you the most? How would you elaborate on it?
Do you have another possible interpretation? What are the implications of each of these interpretations on the world? What is your basis for deciding which interpretation to adopt? It should be emphasized that at present no one fully understands quantum mechanics. And thus there is no clear authority on which interpretation is more accurate.
In particular, psychic and mystical experiences have been reported throughout history and in all cultures. Laboratory experiments attempting to demonstrate psychic effects have been conducted since the late nineteenth century. The cumulative evidence from the discipline of parapsychology strongly suggests that some psychic phenomena do exist. Many scientists assume that such research consists of ghostbusting by dubiously credentialed "paranormal investigators," as this is how the media tends to portray parapsychology.
In fact there is a long and distinguished history of academic scientists who have seriously investigated these phenomena and published their results in peer-reviewed journals. When this body of data is assessed without prejudice, there is strong evidence that we can gain information without the use of the ordinary senses, unbound by the usual constraints of space and time.
The evidence remains controversial because these effects are impossible under the rules of classical physics. But the space-time flexibility, nonlocality, and acausal connections described by quantum physics do allow for such phenomena. For more information on developing intuition go to: Bohm's "wholeness" interpretation, in which everything is ultimately interconnected with everything else, seems particularly compatible with psychic phenomena.
I magine that at some deep level of reality, our brains are in intimate communion with the entire universe as Bohm's interpretation proposes. If this were true, what might it feel like on an experiential level? You might occasionally get glimpses of information about other people's minds, distant objects, the future, or the past. You would gain this information not through ordinary senses and not because signals from other minds and objects somehow traveled to your brain, but because your brain is already coexistent with other minds, distant objects, and everything else.
To navigate this psychic space, you would focus your attention inward rather than outward. This proposal is supported by the role of attentional focusing in meditation practice, which has long been associated with the development of spontaneous psychic and mystical experiences.
From this perspective psychic experiences may be reinterpreted not as mysterious powers of the mind but as momentary glimpses of quantum wholeness, the fabric of reality itself Resource: For more information on the science of parapsychology, see www. Another uses an electronic random number generator based on the direction that photons take upon hitting a half-silvered mirror; and detects whether the mind can influence the photon's "decision" about which path to travel.
These experiments continue a legacy of a half-century of research by many scientists around the world who have explored the role of mind in the physical world.
Overall this body of research suggests that mind does interact with matter to a small degree, and so far no simple explanatory model has been developed that clearly explains how this happens.
The answer may well lie in an improved understanding of the quantum realities. With a friend, close your eyes and sit quietly, focusing your attention on an object until your mind becomes relatively still. With eyes still closed.
Partner A thinks of an event or image that is potent and that can be held in vivid awareness. Partner B just notices any impressions or images that come to mind and writes them down. Then Partner A chooses another image. Repeat three times and trade roles. Then check your answers against the actual image. Science and Mysticism Does quantum mechanics help us to understand consciousness? How does it inform our understanding of the spiritual dimensions of our experience?
We must remember in our attempts to address these questions that confusion can arise when we mix metaphors with mathematics. There are clearly areas of commonality between mystical experiences of unity and what physicists describe as the quantum field. Still, the leaders of quantum mechanics— including Niels Bohr, Werner Heisenberg, and Erwin Schrodinger— rejected the idea that physics and mysticism were describing the same phenomena.
In the words of Max Planck, efforts to bring them together are "founded on a misunderstanding or, more precisely, on a confusion of the images of religion with scientific statements. Needless to say, the result makes no sense at all.
As noted by Tom Huston in his review of What the Bleep? In our postmodern and scientific age, what is the most obvious direction for a spiritually seeking soul to turn in search of Truth with a capital T after traditional mythic religion has been seen through and left behind?
Why, it's toward science, surely, with its claim to universal truth and its mathematical certainty to ten decimal places about the inner logic of space and time. Having our spiritual beliefs backed by science lends them some degree of legitimacy, however tenuous the connection.
Moreover, it seems to make those beliefs more easily defensible against the preying guards of scientific authority— that is, the skeptics and scientific materialists of our era— both when encountering such adversaries in the world at large and when the same materialist doubts arise in our own minds. That we should even feel the need to overcome the doubt of the scientific materialist worldview indicates how all-pervasive it actually is, and how thoroughly steeped in it most of us are.
How do you treat Icnowledge that cannot be proven scientifically? How do you know something is true? Study Guide Quantum Reality We need not force a scientific explanation onto intuitive insiglits into tine connections between science and spirit. We can let our intuitions and spiritual insights stand and be evaluated on their own terms, for their beauty and their power to inspire and stir a feeling of deep accord between ourselves and the world.
As British physicist Sir Arthur Eddington put it a century ago: I n the mystic sense of the creation around us, in the expression of art, in a yearning towards God, the soul grows upward and finds the fulfillment of something implanted in its nature. The pursuit of science [also] springs from a striving which the mind is impelled to follow, a questioning that will not be suppressed. Whether in the intellectual pursuits of science or in the mystical pursuits of the spirit, the light beckons ahead and the purpose surging in our nature responds.
Nor can we say that we know what reality we are perceiving. Until more secrets are revealed, perhaps all we can say is "What the bleep do we know? Can you imagine a world in which objects do not have intrinsic properties?
How much of reality do you think exists separate from our perception of it?
What the Bleep !?
How much does our method of questioning nature influence the answers nature gives to our questions? How would it change your life if you experienced reality as an open-ended conversation or dialogue? If the world is the result of a participatory interplay between ourselves and nature, to what extent do you think reality is arbitrary? Quantum physics is a physics of possibilities Can you think of a time in your life when your experience was extended beyond its previous range, revealing that your view of the world was, in some sense, an illusion?
If the strange properties of quantum theory are only observable on the atomic scale, to what extent do you think quantum theory is relevant to your ordinary experience? Study Guide Quantum Reality Quotations Those who are not shocked when they first come across quantum theory cannot possibly have understood it.
This extrapolation is impossible, however. Wheeler "I think it is safe to say that no one understands quantum mechanics. Do not keep saying to yourself, if you can possibly avoid it, 'But how can it be like that? Nobody knows how it can be like that. The Ghost in the Atom: A Discussion of the jviysteries of Quantum Physics. Cambridge University Press, Feynman, Richard.
The Strange Theory of Light and jviatter. Princeton University Press, Greene, Brian. The Elegant Universe: Vintage, Hawking, Stephen. A Brief History of Time: Bantam, Heisenberg, Werner. Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science. Harper and Row, Physics and Beyond: Encounters and Conversations. Herbert, Nick. Quantum Reality: Beyond the New Physics. Anchor Books, McFarlane, Thomas.
The I llusion of Materialism: Center Voice: Zukav, Gary. The Dancing Wu Li Masters. Bantam Books, Frequently Asked Questions edited by Paul Budnik www. An interactive tour of fundamental particles and forces Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory www. McFarlane www. What is the power of intention? I s there a deeper order to the universe? People are always blaming their circumstances for what they are. I don't believe in circumstances. The people who get on in this world are the people who get up and look for the circumstances that they want, and if they can't find them, make them.
What if all thoughts, conscious or not, influence the world? Would we start the day yelling at our children? Dashing out the door? Making "to do" lists? How would it change our lives? While the theoretical explanations for mind-matter interaction effects are not yet conclusive, many of us intuitively feel the power of intention.
The Little Book of Bleeps: Quotations From The Movie What the Bleep Do We Know!?""
Joe Dispenza describes his practice of consciously creating his day: I wake up in the morning, and I consciously create my day the way I want it to happen. We're consciously, from a spiritual standpoint, throwing in the idea that our thoughts affect our reality or affect our life. I have this little pact. I say, "I'm taking this time to create my day" and I'm infecting the Quantum Field. Now, if it is a fact, that the observer's watching me the whole time that I am doing this, and there is this spiritual aspect to myself, then "show me a sign today that you paid attention to any one of these things that I created.
Bring them in a way that I won't expect, so I 'm surprised at my ability to be able to experience these things and make it so I have no doubt that its come from you. Take a moment to set an intention for your time exploring the ideas and practices in this guide.
If you're in a study group, go around the circle sharing your intention with the whole group. You can clarify your intention by reflecting on the following questions: What draws you to this exploration?
What do you want to get out of it? Why does it matter to you? How do we "infect the quantum field" so that inexplicable things happen that are in alignment with our intentions? How can we indeed "create our days? I ntentions continuously affect the world by guiding our actions. You intend to mow the lawn, eventually you mow the lawn, and the lawn is physically changed. So the real mystery is not whether intentions influence the world indirectly, but whether the human mind influences the physical world by an act of intention directly— without physical contact of any sort.
Intention is a long-standing puzzle in the study of human consciousness. Operationally defined, intention involves directing the mind, with purpose and efficacy, toward some object or outcome. I ntention represents both challenges and opportunities for deepening our understanding of how we might create our days. I ndeed, it draws our focus to some of the most interesting and perplexing questions about the connections among mind, body and spirit— leading us to explore the influence of consciousness both directly and indirectly on individual and collective well-being.
We can speak of three key areas of research on intention: Self-directed intention. How our intentions, particularly visualizations, influence our bodies and minds. This area of research includes the neuroscience and biochemistry of emotions, which we explore in the chapter. Healing the Past. How our intentions influence others through direct or indirect communication. This area explores the possibility that the expectations of others may actually influence our health and well-being. Transpersonal intention.
Ways in which our intentions might influence others and the world through nonphysical and nonsensory means, for example, as reported claims of distant healing, intercessory prayer, or mind over matter.
This area challenges core precepts of the Newtonian worldview's assumption of separation. What's going on here? Top athletes daydreaming between practice sessions? Not at all. These are athletes who have discovered, often quite accidentally, the validity of psychologist and champion body builder Charles Garfield's maxim for athletic success: Once the physical training is done, the difference between winning and not winning is in your head.
Since the publication thirty years ago of W. Timothy Gallwey's The I nner Game of Tennis, in fact, more and more professional competitors and weekend jocks alike are entertaining the possibility that the mind is the playing field on which the real game takes places. There is a growing consensus that the next breakthroughs in athletic performance will come not so much from more muscle bulk and skeletal strength as from a skillful combination of physical training and the use of such largely neglected "powers of the mind" as concentration, meditation, visualization, and inner sensing.
Study Guide Creating Our Days Researchers have been exploring what might be called the "mental game" of fitness for many decades, and coming up with provocative findings.
A study of suggestion and hypnosis by M. Arnold was among the first to suggest what modern-day physiologists now take for granted: And in a study of the electrophysiology of mental activities, Edmund J acobson found that using a combination of visual imagery and internal feeling "proprioception" , as opposed to only visual imagery, produced greater muscle action during imagined weight lifting.
The philosopher Alfred North Whitehead put forward the view that everything in the universe, from particles to planets alike, is in constant contact, exerting varying degrees of creative influence on each other Resource: These include the environment, economic and educational resources, cultural forces, political and organizational contexts, biological factors, psychological and personality issues, and interpersonal relationships.
The psychologist Mihaly Csikszentmihaiyi encourages us to recognize the complex nature of creativity and the need to adopt a new "model in which the person is a part of a system of mutual influences" Csikszentmihaiyi, , We are not exclusively responsible for the outcome of our intentions, but we are part of a larger chorus of creativity that is constantly exerting influences on what manifests around us. We are participants in a creative process that is both originating within our own consciousness and interrelated to the whole universe.
How does intention that is communicated through interactions with others influence our minds and bodies? I nteresting studies done on placebos provide clues. Traditionally, researchers use placebos in clinical tests to investigate the effects of a drug.
As an inert substance, the placebo is not intended to have any benefit, but instead to provide a baseline by which to measure the effectiveness of the active drug. However, placebos do prove to have beneficial effects. How is this possible? What is the power of suggestion?
Every interaction between healthcare providers and their clients has at least some component of suggestion built in. Whether we know it or not, we are "listening" to and interpreting the messages our healthcare provider unconsciously conveys through every gesture and vocal tone, facial expression and innuendo. In other words, we pick up on the practitioner's unconscious messages.
These signals affect our own beliefs about our health, and our beliefs inform our healing as we have already seen. This "placebo effect," the powerful influence of a healer's intentions on the patient puzzles and disturbs many researchers. After all, it seems to prevent them from collecting reliable data on "real" medicine.
But, these placebos may in fact turn out to be a key to our understanding the connection between intention, belief, expectation and bodily responses. While more research needs to be done to examine the nature of factors like rapport, anticipation and hope in everyday life, there is research showing that long-term states of distress, hopelessness and despair can cause serious disruptions to the healing process.
Or can the human mind influence the physical world by an act of intention directly - that is, without physical contact of any sort? Does intentionality require force as conventional physics dictates?
Or is there something more to consciousness than its physical properties? If intentionality is somehow causal rather than merely caused, then how can it be included, even potentially, in our usual concept of "scientific laws? Parapsychology is the scientific study of anomalous mind- matter interactions, including telepathy mind to mind , clairvoyance mind to object or event , precognition knowledge of future events , and psychokinesis mind over matter.
Most of the scientific evidence for the effects of mind- matter interaction fall into two classes: Intention directed at living systems and intention directed at inanimate systems.
There are several professional scientific communities studying distant intention. These include the Parapsychological Association www. A training program on parapsychology research will be held by the Institute of Noetic Sciences www. To test your own parapsychological abilities, visit a set of online psi games at www.
The literature on these studies is massive and uneven in quality, but overall it suggests that intention can affect living systems to some degree. A cautious assessment is that intention appears to weakly correlate but perhaps not influence in the physical sense of applying force with changes in the behavior of a wide range of living systems. For example, a meta-analysis published in the British J ournal of Psychology in revealed that in independently replicated, rigorously controlled, double blind laboratory experiments, the thoughts of one person had a measurable effect on the physiological state of another person.
The two people in these distant healing experiments were isolated in soundproof and electromagnetically shielded chambers to exclude any ordinary signals from passing between them. And yet, when a "sending" person directed calming or activating thoughts at a "receiving" person, the receiver's body complied in the desired direction. There are as yet no well-accepted theoretical explanations for why this occurs, but evidence that it does happen is becoming increasingly persuasive. The Scientific Truth of Psychic Phenomena, Harper Collins, is Senior Scientist at the Institute of Noetic Sciences, where he and his colleagues study extended human capacities, including mind- matter interactions.
Radin worked with Princeton University psychologist Roger Nelson, who in spearheaded a worldwide collaboration among 75 researchers, to create the Global Consciousness Project GCP. The goal of the GCP is to determine whether world events that tend to focus mass consciousness, like international sports events, natural disasters and acts of terrorism, might influence devices that randomly generate numbers based on quantum noise.
The results of this experiment to date show strong overall evidence for some form of mass mind- matter interaction. For example, during and immediately after the terrorist attacks of September 11, on the World Trade Centers and on the Russian school hostages in September in the city of Beslan, the random numbers being generated world-wide became unusually orderly. Electronic random number generators are a kind of electronic coin-flippen On days with nothing particularly interesting was happening, the random numbers reverted back to their expected random behavior.
The scientists are hypothesizing that events that cause "mass mind" to become coherent affect physical matter itself Scientists are beginning to catch up with philosophers and mystics in acknowledging that the data does seem to show that mind and matter are somehow linked in fundamental ways, and that maybe thoughts do affect the world in subtle ways. For more information on the GCP see http: This site includes the full list of results, explanations, background materials and the raw data.
You can also visit www. For information on the studies and uses of Random Number Generators see www. For a longer list see www. These experiments have focused on the fall of tossed dice and the behavior of electronic random number generators.
The former involves tossing a die and wishing or intending for a certain die face to land up. The latter involves wishing for streams of random bits zeros and ones to become biased so as to produce more ones than zeros, or vice versa. In both cases, analyses of all known experiments, numbering in the hundreds indicates that under well- controlled laboratory conditions intention does weakly correlate with predictable changes in the behavior of these random systems.
What groups use their creative powers to manifest opposing goals? What determines which one will prevail? How can we tell the difference between our own thoughts and suggestion?
The person first tries to "aim high," meaning to get more I's than O's. On the second button press, the person "aims low," and on a third, has no aim to act as a control.
After 12 years and hundreds of thousands of such button pressing by hundreds of participants, the results were clear: The mind makes random numbers comply weakly, and observed so far only in statistical form with its will.
Whether this is due to an energetic effect, or a more abstract probabilistic shift in the random numbers, or an even more exotic explanation, is not yet certain. But the evidence that something interesting is going on is exceedingly strong. Masaru Emoto's research on the "message of water" is featured prominently in the film. While this work is highly compelling, it is more an artistic metaphor of mind-matter interaction effects than a scientific fact.
As presented in Dr. Emoto's books, it does not yet meet the rigor of Western scientific controls. It is unclear, for example, how many pictures were taken, the precise methods by which individual crystals were selected for examination, and many other details, which would make this work acceptable to rigorous experimental standards.
Beyond these missing details, this work has not been published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, so we cannot have confidence that scientists who are knowledgeable about the chemistry of water which is extremely complex have agreed that the effects presented are credible. Still, the work is highly intriguing and calls for independent replications.
How do we know if we're actually creating our day? What are the signs? More than likely we look for evidence that the universe is "listening" and responding to our thoughts. You open a book randomly and find the precise answer to a question you were thinking about.
You get an offer for a dream job the day you decide to quit your old job. You think about a friend minutes before they call. As J oe Dispenza said, "Out of nowhere, little things happen that are so unexplainable, I know they are the process or the result of my creation.
J ung was the first psychologist to explore "meaningful coincidences" as events that defy the normal laws of causality. Jung was unable to explain through the normal action of cause and effect the "meaningful coincidences" he witnessed repeatedly, yet it seemed mistaken to reflexively write them off as pure chance.
For example, one of his patients dreamed that she received a golden scarab, an insect that plays an important role in Egyptian mythology. Later, when she was telling J ung the dream, he heard a gentle tapping at the window, and when he opened it, in flew a beetle that was Switzerland's equivalent to the golden scarab. How do discoveries in science influence your life? How would you live if you recognized the full power of your intention?
Maybe, Maybe Not! He reasoned that if these events were not causally connected, perhaps they were the manifestations of some non-causal connecting principle. He was encouraged along these lines because it seemed that modern physics, in developing quantum theory, had broken with causality.
In that case we have to suppose a 'knowledge' prior to all consciousness. J ung's Synchronicity" at www. Researchers at the Institute of Noetic Sciences have explored the hypothesis that people unconsciously know when they're about to view upsetting photos.
Dean Radin has found that electrical resistance of viewers' skin rises before they are about to view a disturbing image, but not before a neutral image. This is not due to anticipation, because the effect is observed even under double-blind conditions when the images are selected at random by a computer.
Researchers at other centers have successfully replicated this effect, using both skin conductance measures and heart rate variability. For more information go to Is There a Sixth Sense? Braud suggests that under special conditions, it may be possible to transcend time in the sense that intentions can work "backwards in time" to influence the past.
At first blush this sounds ridiculous, for how can we change what has already happened? But intention seems to be able to influence the initial seed moments or decisions upon which events come into being in the first place, and then ultimately unfold.
Thus, as we are making dozens of minor decisions throughout the day, the possibility arises that our future self may be influencing those decisions.
Something very close to this has been observed in repeated laboratory experiments by first blindly recording streams of random bits generated by truly random number generators; that is, no one observes the bits while they are being recorded.
The next day, the bits are played back while a person is asked to try to influence them to get more I's say, than O's according to instructions generated that day, i.
These experiments indicate that prerecorded random bits conformed to intentions produced in the future, or equivalently that the unobserved bits in the past somehow conformed to intention generated in the present.This provides the act of observation an especially privileged role of collapsing the possible into the actual. One cannot help but be in awe when one contemplates the mysteries of eternity, of life, of the marvelous structure of reality. Rediscover the Transforming Power of Conversation.
Meaning is projected by the human mind onto nature. You get an offer for a dream job the day you decide to quit your old job. Find a location where it is easy for you to have a period of uninterrupted practice.
The questions that draw you to this adventure are deep questions that philosophers, scientists and mystics have been exploring for thousands of years. How do we evaluate what is true?
In short, says Satinover, 'Quantum mechanics allows for the intangible phenomenon of freedom to be woven into human nature.
What are the implications?