Rules for radicals: a practical primer for realistic radicals / Saul D. Alinsky. —. Vintage give meaning to what I and the radicals of my generation have done. First published in , Rules for Radicals is Saul Alinsky's impassioned counsel to young radicals on how to effect constructive social change. Saul Alinsky was a brilliant man. Evil, but brilliant. Unfortunately, whether we like it or not, everyone on the Left from the President on down is.

Rules For Radicals Pdf

Language:English, German, Dutch
Genre:Science & Research
Published (Last):24.03.2015
ePub File Size:29.31 MB
PDF File Size:8.58 MB
Distribution:Free* [*Sign up for free]
Uploaded by: SHARA

Rules for Radicals Defeated: A Practical Guide for Defeating Obama / Alinsky Tactics - site edition by Jeff Hedgpeth. Download it once and read it on your. Alinsky_Saul_D_Rules_for_Radicals_A_Practical_Primer_for_Realistic_Radicals .pdf (file size: KB, MIME type: application/pdf). hope to leave you today with some rules for radicals, 10 rules to their PDF documents from PACER—where we'd recycle them into the.

If you push a negative hard and deep enough, it will break through into its counterside.

The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative. Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.

Because Alinsky was sensitive to criticism that he wasn't ethical, he also included a set of rules for the ethics of power tactics. You can see from these why his ethics were so frequently questioned.

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)

Rules to test whether power tactics are ethical: 1. One's concern with the ethics of means and ends varies inversely with one's personal interest in the issue. The judgment of the ethics of means is dependent upon the political position of those sitting in judgment.

In war the end justifies almost any means. Judgment must be made in the context of the times in which the action occurred and not from any other chronological vantage point. Concern with ethics increases with the number of means available and vice versa.

download for others

The less important the end to be desired, the more one can afford to engage in ethical evaluations of means. Generally, success or failure is a mighty determinant of ethics. The morality of means depends upon whether the means is being employed at a time of imminent defeat or imminent victory. Any effective means is automatically judged by the opposition to be unethical. You do what you can with what you have and clothe it in moral garments. There's obviously a lot more to it.

Alinsky's book is still available in most college bookstores and on site and is worth reading. Not all liberals have read his book or know his name, but his tactics have become universal.

Follow the Author

Sadly for conservatives, when two evenly matched forces go head-to-head outside of a fairy tale, the side that tries to play nice usually ends up with its head in a box. So, don't lie or become an evil person like Alinsky, but learn from what he wrote and give the Left a taste of its own medicine. Always remember the first rule of power tactics: Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.

The second rule is: Never go outside the experience of your people. Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat. The tenth rule: The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.

Boycotts have fallen out of favor on the Right because the Left has used that tactic to target conservative radio. This is a mistake. That's because there are a lot more conservatives than there are liberals and we're much more capable of using the tactic effectively.

There are roughly million people who identify with conservatism in this country and almost twice as many Christians. When there are threats that Christians and conservatives will refuse to go see movies, stop downloading products, or cancel subscriptions, it will scare some people straight.

That threat should be used and carried out much more often. Want to know why Republicans are so terrible at reaching out to minorities? Because identity politics works really, really well and conservatives tend to oppose it on principle. So, white Republicans are constantly trying to go outside of their experience and reach out to minorities who are generally disinclined to listen to them because they have the wrong skin color.

When the GOP accepts reality, adopts the tactics of the Democratic Party, and starts paying off our own Sharptons and Jesse Jacksons to reach out to minority groups and call Democrats racists , we'll start making inroads with minorities for the first time in decades.

The GOP often foolishly retreats from social issues.

We don't have to preach at anyone, wag our fingers, or turn into legions of Ned Flanders, but we shouldn't be afraid to talk about our Christian beliefs, stick up for Christians who are under attack, and hammer the Left for its anti-Christian bigotry. Conservatism is a pro-Christian ideology and liberalism is an anti-Christian ideology.

We should never be afraid to drive that point home. This is something conservatives have gotten much better at in the last few years, but we seldom take it far enough.

If we did, a tax cheat who advocates higher taxes could certainly never be our Treasury Secretary, Barack Obama would be afraid to associate with race hustlers like Al Sharpton or one percenters like Warren Buffet, and Al Gore would have either given up his mansion or his status as the leader of the cult of global warming. Conservatives have a tendency to try to win every debate with logic and recitations of facts which, all too often, fail to get the job done because emotions and mockery are often just as effective as reason.

The good news is that liberals almost never have logic on their side; so they're incapable of rationally making the case for their policies while conservatives can become considerably more effective debaters by simply adding some emotion-based arguments and sheer scorn to their discourse. This has certainly worked on Twitter, where conservatives keep making the Obama campaign look like buffoons by taking over its hashtags. Sometimes Republicans get too serious about politics.

Why not hold a fund raiser at the gun range? What's wrong with having Kid Rock or a bunch of popular country musicians play at a massive voter registration drive? How about building some giant puppet heads of our own, featuring Nancy Pelosi injecting botox into her face or Barack Obama punching the Pope in the stomach? A little controversy and fun draw in the eyeballs and gets people excited.

This one seems self-explanatory, but in practice, it can be tough to keep things on a timeline.

This is what happened to the Occupy Movement, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the Republican race for the presidency, too. Conservatives fall down on this one all the time.

Anyone interested in staying, or becoming, Union Free, whether in an organizing

Just when Obama's SuperPac was starting to feel real pressure over taking a million dollar donation from Bill Maher , conservatives eased up. This is also why liberal film stars feel so comfortable trashing conservatives, Christians, and Americans -- even right before their film comes out.Evil, but brilliant. These tactics as a result of decades of organizing efforts, along with many other lessons, were poured into Rules for Radicals to create the guidebook for community organization.

Once the community was united behind a common symbol, Alinsky would find a common enemy for the community to be united against. The Alinsky Model.

If you push a negative hard and deep enough, it will break through into its counterside. Not all liberals have read his book or know his name, but his tactics have become universal.

WILDA from Atlanta
I relish studying docunments mockingly . Review my other posts. I have always been a very creative person and find it relaxing to indulge in tent pegging.