Handbook of cephalometric superimposition Herman S. Duterloo and Pierre- Georges Planché; Quintessesnce; ; bestthing.info; pages; $ This large 'handbook' takes an evidence-based approach to cephalometrics and summarises the available literature on the various topics. more demanding if we are attempting to really understand the issue of observed cephalometric change. Handbook of Cephalometric Superimposition helps the.
|Language:||English, German, Arabic|
|Genre:||Fiction & Literature|
|ePub File Size:||23.58 MB|
|PDF File Size:||10.16 MB|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Sign up for free]|
Handbook of Cephalometric Superimposition Herman S. Duterloo, . Superimposition by Herman S. Duterloo, Pierre-Georges Planche Free PDF d0wnl0ad. Handbook of cephalometric superimposition pdf. Handbook of Cephalometric Superimposition Herman S. Duterloo, Pierre-Georges Planche. Superimposition of cephalometric images is the universally used method for demonstrating and evaluating growth and treatment outcomes in the dentofacial .
Author Manuscript We have chosen the absolute value of the maximum discrepancy between surfaces homologous dental arches were compared pair-wise in three replicate positioning as our variable of interest.
This variable is representative of the maximum error between registration instances and it may overestimate the error. However, given the small variability obtained, we considered it safer to overestimate rather than to underestimate. This small magnitude estimates for the upper and lower dental arch are not considered significant clinically.
Registration of Setup Models to Final Models to Assess Treatment Precision Author Manuscript Digital models offer a clear advantage over dental casts in assessing longitudinal changes given that they can be registered and superimposed in space Jang et al.
Among other methods of treatment results assessment in orthodontics, outcomes in orthodontics also can be assessed by comparing the obtained outcome with the planned setup. In order to evaluate the reliability of the ICP registration of setup models to their homologous final outcome model, the following study was accomplished.
Methods Author Manuscript Sample—In order to assess the reliability of registration of final digital models to digital models of initial setups, a second sample consisting of models of five patients was selected randomly from the population of 94 consecutive treated patients.
For each patient two sets of models were available: final models post-orthodontic treatment obtained the day of bracket de-bonding and setup model made on a duplicate of the malocclusion models before orthodontic treatment. Software Author Manuscript Models were repositioned in space to reproduce their occlusion relationship using method described in the first part of this chapter.
The surfaces were simplified to 50, points using the Qslim 2. The same process was followed for the lower setup model.
The registration process was repeated three times per dental arch, per patient, rendering three relative positions of the upper and lower setup arches to the final models Fig. Setup and final dental arch positions were compared pair-wise and average surface distance was computed between homologous record arches. The variable of interest was the absolute value of the standard deviation surface distance between final and setup models as a proxy of the average discrepancy due to the registration process.
Statistical Analysis Author Manuscript In order to assess whether the error in replicate positioning varies by dental arch, the standard deviation was used to summarize the deviation between replicates.
A repeated measures analysis was performed, allowing for different compound symmetry covariance structures for each dental arch. Results The estimated maximum difference in replicate positioning is shown in Table 3. The summary of the statistical model analysis is displayed in Table 4. These data suggest that there is no statistically significant difference between the upper and lower arches in the average discrepancy in replicate positioning and no statistically significant differences between replicate positioning across the entire sample.
Models from different time points must be registered to that coordinate system; and 3. Models are superimposed and the differences among them are evaluated.
In order to combine different records in the same coordinate system, stable structures — which did not change with time or treatment — are defined and used as registration regions. Once registered, structures that did change can be described qualitatively and quantitatively. Author Manuscript While the orthodontic community is waiting for a reliable longitudinal registration of sequential dental models to assess tooth movement, other methods to assess treatment outcomes are being used.
Even though it is one of the best methods available at this point, it depends on fixed anatomical relationships rather than on actual tooth movement. Due to that limitation, its results often are influenced by the tooth anatomy.
Author Manuscript Researchers have been looking for stable structures within the dental models to be used as registration landmarks or surfaces Baumrind et al.
The main problem using rugae as stable registration surfaces is that, as in any registration process, the further away from the registration surface a point is, the greater the registration error becomes Cha et al.
While the rugae may be reliable to assess tooth movement in the premolar region mainly in cases treated with no extractions , it may not be precise enough to assess changes in the molar region. In addition, small changes in rugae morphology will have great effects on the relative vertical position of molars between time points.
Recently Jang and colleagues compared the rugae registration method with registration on miniscrews placed in the maxilla and concluded that the medial points of the third palatal rugae and the palatal vault could be used as reference landmarks. An efficient way to assess treatment outcomes, not tooth movement, would be to register and superimpose the models obtained after orthodontic treatment on the setup or planned correction.
While this method does not allow for calculation of tooth movement due to treatment and growth, it does allow for calculation in the discrepancy between planned position and obtained position relative to intra-arch tooth alignment. The first step for such method is the establishment of reproducible registration method. Page 7 Author Manuscript depend on stable structures, but rather utilizes the whole surface during the computation of the registration parameters. Given that the differences between surfaces final treatment and planned setup are relatively small, the registration error is divided among all teeth based on their size.
The reliability of this method depends on the relative initial position of the surfaces before registration process, because ICP registration uses optimization methods to identify a minimum surface distance value between surfaces. Given that the surfaces we register are similar but not equal, we have chosen the standard deviation as a proxy variable for the registration variability. If we use the average surface distance between surfaces, we would underestimate the error in registration because positive errors would cancel negative ones.
The absolute value of the maximum distance between surfaces also is not representative of the discrepancy between registration instances given that the surfaces are not equal. Once surfaces are registered, the difference between positions of individual teeth can be measured and expressed in terms of six degrees of freedom Fig.
Acknowledgments Author Manuscript We would like to thank Dr. Partially funded by R01 DE Stability of the palatal rugae as landmarks for analysis of dental casts. Angle Orthod. A 3-dimensional analysis of molar movement during headgear treatment.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
Handbook of cephalometric superimposition
Stability of the palatal rugae as landmarks for analysis of dental casts in extraction and nonextraction cases. Using three-dimensional imaging to assess treatment outcomes in orthodontics: A progress report from the University of the Pacific. Orthod Craniofac Res. Computer-assisted treatment planning and analysis.
Assessment of the accuracy of a three-dimensional imaging system for archiving dental study models. J Orthod. Sutural growth of the upper face studied by the implant method. Acta Odontol Scand. Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs: American Board of Orthodontics. Analysis of tooth movement in extraction cases using three-dimensional reverse engineering technology.
Eur J Orthod. Accuracy and reliability of palatal superimposition of three-dimensional digital models. Vertical growth-related changes in the positions of palatal rugae and maxillary incisors.
Surface simplification using quadric error metrics. Proceedings of the 24th annual conference on interactive techniques; Los Angeles, CA. Digital and plaster models: A comparison of measurements and times. Prog Orthod. Consistency of orthodontic treatment decisions relative to diagnostic records. Evaluation of a software program for applying the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system to digital casts.
The use of palatal rugae for the assessment of anteroposterior tooth movements. An inventory of United States and Canadian growth record sets: Preliminary report. A novel method for the assessment of three-dimensional tooth movement during orthodontic treatment.
Balancing the books on orthodontic treatment: An integrated analysis of change. Br J Orthod. How well does Invisalign work?
A prospective clinical study evaluating the efficacy of tooth movement with Invisalign. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts. How to avoid common errors in clinical photography. Motohashi N, Kuroda T. A 3D computer-aided design system applied to diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.
Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models. Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: Digital vs.
The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. An evaluation of the use of digital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.
Handbook of cephalometric superimposition pdf
Orthodontic study cast analysis: Reproducibility of recordings and agreement between conventional and 3D virtual measurements. J Digit Imaging. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs. A comparison of 3 computerized Bolton toothsize analyses with a commonly used method.
Embed Size px. Start on.
Handbook of cephalometric superimposition
Show related SlideShares at end. WordPress Shortcode. Published in: Full Name Comment goes here. Are you sure you want to Yes No. Be the first to like this. No Downloads. Views Total views. Actions Shares. Embeds 0 No embeds. No notes for slide. Handbook of cephalometric superimposition pdf 1.
Handbook of Cephalometric Superimposition Herman S. Duterloo, Pierre-Georges Planche 2. Quintessence Pub Co Release Date: Superimposition of cephalometric images is the universally used method for demonstrating and evaluating growth and treatment outcomes in the dentofacial complex in individual patients. However, traditional procedures for cephalometric superimposition are based on the use of periosteally located landmarks or their dependant substitutes, which are unstable over time.
This renders interpretation of pretreatment-to-posttreatment changes unreliable. Reliable measurement of local, actual changes in direction and amount is possible, allowing interpretation of the biologic events that took place.
This book provides a critical, in-depth review of the history of cephalometric superimposition and the background and development of the structural method; demonstrates how to apply the structural method; and provides help and instruction for correct interpretation of the resulting superimpositions.
Accurate cephalometric tracings and superimpositions represent the best way to demonstrate and evaluate changes resulting from dentofacial skeletal growth and treatment. This book will help readers to produce superimpositions with maximal accuracy, based on the best available scientific biologic evidence. Contents 1. History and Origin of the Structural Method 2.
Validity and Reliability:Interpreting Growth and Treatment Changes in Superimpositions 6. There were 2 interac- advantage that it can be automated by the computer, tions that were statistically significant. This review also studied the accuracy and reliability of lateral cephalograms and its cephalometric analysis.
Log in to Wiley Online Library
The LS-5 method used the Both examiners received digital copies of the 8 least-square average of 5 cranial base landmarks, Sella, cephalometric radiographs a to h as well as the 3 Nasion, Porion, Orbitale, and Basion, with equal sets of the master tracings 1 to 3 of each cephalo- weights. Article metrics. This textbook is a unique and valuable addition to the orthodontic literature that can be recommended to everyone who needs to possess an in-depth understanding of craniofacial growth and its modulations through orthodontic intervention.
It has eight chapters.
- OP AMP APPLICATIONS HANDBOOK PDF
- TURBOFAN AND TURBOJET ENGINES DATABASE HANDBOOK EPUB
- WATER VOLE CONSERVATION HANDBOOK EPUB
- ORACLE JDEVELOPER 11G HANDBOOK PDF
- INCOSE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING HANDBOOK V3.2 PDF DOWNLOAD
- TINY BUDDHA PDF
- MANORAMA YEARBOOK 2016 TELUGU PDF
- HSC TIMETABLE 2015 COMMERCE MAHARASHTRA BOARD PDF